From: Ian Stakenvicius <axs@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: Proxy maintainers in metadata.xml (was Re: [gentoo-dev] introduce a soft-limit policy for changing other developers ebuilds)
Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2012 10:54:25 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50C0BFB1.6050407@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121206152724.19286.qmail@stuge.se>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
On 06/12/12 10:27 AM, Peter Stuge wrote:
> [ Snip! ] In the last 15 hours I've dealt with several trivial bugs
> that I've found fixes for in bugzilla but which were not committed
> anywhere.
>
> I've committed them to my overlay and that's fine for me, but if I
> were a developer I would find it super lame to have to stop there
> and wait for $otherguy to take time to look at "his" bugs. [ Snip!
> ]
>
> I would expect to fix the bugs, and then email patches to whoever
> is the maintainer. It would be worthwhile to have automatic
> extraction of who needs to get that email based on what files were
> touched. No bug needed, if maintainers get perfect patches in email
> they can review them quickly and simply push them into the tree.
There's a bit of an issue with this, though -- for many projects, and
many bugs, patches are not committed to the tree until that bug and
patch has been submitted upstream (job of the maintainer) and upstream
has approved or accepted that patch. I think quite often this is why
patches sit in bugs instead of getting to the tree.
Essentially, if the problem is with the ebuild or the way the package
is integrated into gentoo, then fixing it immediately is fine. If the
problem is with the software itself, then usually upstream needs to be
involved before the fix will occur in gentoo.
Also, Emailing patches to the maintainer is much less
acceptable/desirable than filing them through bugzilla. As a
developer, I find it much easier to grab patches from this nice
centralized bug-tracking filing system than to have to organize them
in email, and git integration is not something I see changing this.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
iF4EAREIAAYFAlDAv7EACgkQ2ugaI38ACPCQ/QEAmYjna1exh9qxqptbdB08Hvoo
TzJi72ux2nf9edZsR3IA+wXENBA1EDuc/8JDN74aJ0/iFdhL1yG2CxJ515tNDxxX
=4d2v
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-12-06 15:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-02 15:21 [gentoo-dev] introduce a soft-limit policy for changing other developers ebuilds hasufell
2012-12-02 15:38 ` Rich Freeman
2012-12-02 19:30 ` Markos Chandras
2012-12-04 1:18 ` Ben de Groot
2012-12-04 7:43 ` Ian Whyman
2012-12-04 9:19 ` Markos Chandras
2012-12-04 15:42 ` Alec Warner
2012-12-04 18:54 ` Markos Chandras
2012-12-06 10:53 ` Ben de Groot
2012-12-04 8:10 ` Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina
2012-12-04 9:23 ` Markos Chandras
2012-12-04 16:01 ` Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina
2012-12-04 17:06 ` Proxy maintainers in metadata.xml (was Re: [gentoo-dev] introduce a soft-limit policy for changing other developers ebuilds) Diego Elio Pettenò
2012-12-04 17:28 ` Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina
2012-12-04 18:35 ` Sergey Popov
2012-12-04 18:48 ` Diego Elio Pettenò
2012-12-04 18:51 ` Markos Chandras
2012-12-06 11:02 ` Ben de Groot
2012-12-06 13:28 ` Markos Chandras
2012-12-06 15:27 ` Peter Stuge
2012-12-06 15:54 ` Ian Stakenvicius [this message]
2012-12-06 16:04 ` Peter Stuge
2012-12-06 19:07 ` Markos Chandras
2012-12-08 17:48 ` Jeroen Roovers
2012-12-04 17:01 ` [gentoo-dev] introduce a soft-limit policy for changing other developers ebuilds hasufell
2012-12-04 17:17 ` Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina
2012-12-04 17:32 ` hasufell
2012-12-04 17:46 ` Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina
2012-12-04 18:17 ` hasufell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50C0BFB1.6050407@gentoo.org \
--to=axs@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox