From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FAA41381F3 for ; Sun, 25 Nov 2012 10:47:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BFC4421C014; Sun, 25 Nov 2012 10:47:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 88F9A21C01C for ; Sun, 25 Nov 2012 10:46:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.4.5] (blfd-4d0830b3.pool.mediaWays.net [77.8.48.179]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: hasufell) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5F72233D82B for ; Sun, 25 Nov 2012 10:46:26 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <50B1F6FF.1010207@gentoo.org> Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2012 11:46:23 +0100 From: hasufell User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.10) Gecko/20121118 Thunderbird/10.0.10 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] proposal for consistency between {RUBY,PYTHON,PHP}_TARGETS References: <2403742.vl7qeNCzhp@virtuoso> In-Reply-To: <2403742.vl7qeNCzhp@virtuoso> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: bb05ecf3-bc9a-4af3-aa4f-8774638f0415 X-Archives-Hash: 9608d8762e1fb62ee5a0ec55e7d66de6 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 11/24/2012 03:30 PM, Theo Chatzimichos wrote: > Hello, > > We currently have values like the following: RUBY_TARGETS="ruby19" > PHP_TARGETS="php5-3" PYTHON_TARGETS="python2_7" > > I find it confusing, and I would like to propose to keep the same > style for all the above values. I personally prefer the ruby one. > Keep in mind that if the relevant teams decide to migrate to some > other style, it needs an announcement and migration plan. > I don't find it confusing and I don't care, so I think it's useless work to migrate to one or another. There are far worse things to fix like the required_use messages confusing users every day if you read #gentoo -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQsfb/AAoJEFpvPKfnPDWzDUoH/29pWD/m5wbuVOhyDciPfP6i sZ0OOT8JtlaysTnbSQrduGETYiZp29fTy7ZTOZkrYEuTZzfc3ozHeMm+aG1kvIjs sWqzWVPFmyRcvO8srZvW3PnWWn2Dirrn4gPw64hUFmOvUR+PFoFSFVDfy/SrY7WG jKaiN5m79KBj76Edd13tYTvAxTjSeSy4Ad0SH0IxcLhGPZQ8R39sGrYpPTLTAHMx aEITq7FChQZqs/fdjBLkoOurYiDgTbbD1X+0+5E8pGXyb0/trJOkDpTyE5EPgfTa W6IUKOj6obFGWPMDH71kFtv7l/u8ryxFIre9m+kSyh2/pC9awSTt0LMLv4oUtQg= =p+nO -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----