From: "Diego Elio Pettenò" <flameeyes@flameeyes.eu>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] proposal for consistency between {RUBY,PYTHON,PHP}_TARGETS
Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2012 08:07:11 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50B0F0AF.7050906@flameeyes.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1353771994.25128.149.camel@big_daddy.dol-sen.ca>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 592 bytes --]
On 24/11/2012 07:46, Brian Dolbec wrote:
> For ruby19, split in the middle to get 1.9, but what about 110, is it
> 11.0 or 1.10.
Okay stop.
There's no 1.10.
There's 2.0 that's being developed for a long time.
And we're not going to change our scheme just because of some
theoretical corner case that has been proven not happening in our world.
Especially since we were the first (and not even with ruby-ng, the
syntax has been the same for years, starting with ruby16).
--
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
flameeyes@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 551 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-24 16:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-24 14:30 [gentoo-dev] proposal for consistency between {RUBY,PYTHON,PHP}_TARGETS Theo Chatzimichos
2012-11-24 14:35 ` Michał Górny
2012-11-24 15:46 ` Brian Dolbec
2012-11-24 16:07 ` Diego Elio Pettenò [this message]
2012-11-24 18:19 ` Peter Stuge
2012-11-24 18:36 ` Diego Elio Pettenò
2012-11-24 18:46 ` Mike Gilbert
2012-11-24 19:20 ` Peter Stuge
2012-11-24 19:29 ` Diego Elio Pettenò
2012-11-26 8:20 ` [gentoo-dev] " Nicolas Sebrecht
2012-11-26 15:42 ` Diego Elio Pettenò
2012-11-24 19:30 ` [gentoo-dev] " Peter Stuge
2012-11-25 4:47 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2012-11-24 19:49 ` [gentoo-dev] " Ole Markus With
2012-11-25 14:42 ` Peter Stuge
2012-11-24 18:40 ` Jauhien Piatlicki
2012-11-24 18:55 ` Diego Elio Pettenò
2012-11-24 18:48 ` Brian Dolbec
2012-11-25 10:46 ` hasufell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50B0F0AF.7050906@flameeyes.eu \
--to=flameeyes@flameeyes.eu \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox