From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 315C41381F3 for ; Fri, 23 Nov 2012 14:33:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 178DC21C08F; Fri, 23 Nov 2012 14:33:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C55F21C08A for ; Fri, 23 Nov 2012 14:32:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.178.20] (p548D1A4B.dip.t-dialin.net [84.141.26.75]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: tommy) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EF4CB33D94D for ; Fri, 23 Nov 2012 14:32:57 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <50AF8916.9070004@gentoo.org> Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2012 15:32:54 +0100 From: Thomas Sachau User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Firefox/17.0 SeaMonkey/2.14 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] open season on other-dev's packages -- policy change? References: <20121123022210.GE4100@comet.hsd1.mn.comcast.net> <50AF84E9.2020608@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <50AF84E9.2020608@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6 OpenPGP: id=211CA2D4 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigC0BDDF8C7F57610A6AB13A71" X-Archives-Salt: 9cc835a5-452a-4e62-b280-9aab5f3b0899 X-Archives-Hash: d045e4c3bf910d9c43df1e66c59f7411 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigC0BDDF8C7F57610A6AB13A71 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ian Stakenvicius schrieb: > On 22/11/12 11:22 PM, Robin H. Johnson wrote: >> On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 08:22:10PM -0600, Donnie Berkholz wrote: >>> On 11:11 Sun 18 Nov , Robin H. Johnson wrote: >>>> Here's a list of every package where I'm a maintainer and there >>>> is no herd listed (but their might be other maintainers): >> I didn't say I was dropping any of the packages, merely making an=20 >> explicit list of packages I maintain, that other developers are >> welcome to touch - if they want to take them over explicitly, that >> would be great too. >=20 >=20 > .. For certain things, I think it would be very beneficial for this > to be true (other dev's welcome to touch) across the tree. Maybe if > there is enough general support for it, we should change our default > of "never touch a maintainer's package without permission of the > maintainer/herd", to "OK to touch unless package metadata explicitly > requests not to" ...? And we can put a tag in the metadata to > indicate this (or even to indicate what other dev's can and can't > touch -- ie, can touch *DEPEND, can bump EAPI, cannot add features, > cannot bump)? >=20 > Thoughts? >=20 >=20 >=20 What certain things do you have in mind? In wich situation do you see a simple "May i touch the package?/ok for this patch?" as too much to do before touching a package? --=20 Thomas Sachau Gentoo Linux Developer --------------enigC0BDDF8C7F57610A6AB13A71 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ iJwEAQECAAYFAlCviRYACgkQG7kqcTWJkGejiwQAmzjkF8dlI3BUF3Uy1PBe5aKw n9EClNDrq175qdbrYyw9tfCTzka+QB16ED2sfyoJn+K49RPftQZn5S/Yo6vGm9Q5 iWPR6YTiTMi8fBkS0eZ/Q/x5vwGSGW8eCt0AjkIubb1HUECmFkUvIIymIPa+fk9Y XKjPP/fTRv/pL26sQwo= =yPJR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigC0BDDF8C7F57610A6AB13A71--