From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-55942-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 334411381F3
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 15:57:22 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A28F321C0EB;
	Sun, 18 Nov 2012 15:57:13 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C957D21C0E9
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 15:56:42 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.0.88] (dynamic-adsl-84-220-92-220.clienti.tiscali.it [84.220.92.220])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	(Authenticated sender: lu_zero)
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 891E933D84F
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 15:56:41 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <50A90535.8000205@gentoo.org>
Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 16:56:37 +0100
From: Luca Barbato <lu_zero@gentoo.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20121004 Thunderbird/15.0.1
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Tightly-coupled core distro [was: Council meeting
 summary for 3 April 2012]
References: <CAGfcS_nPz=6kGg49kwZ-6GGAeB0fixzUQxyyXbU8-bbO0ndKng@mail.gmail.com> <jn04lk$q2i$1@dough.gmane.org> <20120423012540.GA2130@waltdnes.org> <jo0q2n$ebp$1@dough.gmane.org> <20120505010529.GD22763@kroah.com> <jo9t9m$aql$1@dough.gmane.org> <20120509183203.GA27545@kroah.com> <CAN3AtvrbJ0d6itGchoAMW4VfEVBvGWH=W8heULjJrLzCeF-g2Q@mail.gmail.com> <4bdd949a377d40eb85590870be440551@HUBCAS1.cs.stonybrook.edu> <50A8943E.7070607@gentoo.org> <20121118080845.GA8628@kroah.com> <50A89A73.3050709@flameeyes.eu> <50A8C257.7060103@mva.name> <50A8F918.2010802@flameeyes.eu> <50A90205.8040402@mva.name> <50A9030A.60806@flameeyes.eu>
In-Reply-To: <50A9030A.60806@flameeyes.eu>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Archives-Salt: 3f050f87-fcff-4dda-a363-8988cc6801ae
X-Archives-Hash: fd4bcf3d4189e02c8ad400647f8162c7

On 11/18/2012 04:47 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
> But yes, many more can't understand that... and neither do I.

Then would be nice if everybody shuts up, let people play with their
toys and if something useful happens evaluate the result.

According to the people that asked me to help the whole thing would had
been an experiment to see if would be possible to have a smaller and
cleaner udev.

I liked the idea since I like alternatives and I consider many choices
from upstream a tad narrow minded (beside the entertaining posts from
Linus about their bug management).

Nobody wanted hype there, just more people willing to chip in some time
and effort to get there.

lu