From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-55907-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B39E1381F3
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 08:50:39 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 306A421C07F;
	Sun, 18 Nov 2012 08:50:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7958821C026
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 08:49:53 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [10.41.238.46] (212-226-41-177-nat.elisa-mobile.fi [212.226.41.177])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	(Authenticated sender: ssuominen)
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 33E6533D826
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 08:49:51 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <50A8A121.9070405@gentoo.org>
Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 10:49:37 +0200
From: Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@gentoo.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121101 Thunderbird/16.0.1
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Tightly-coupled core distro [was: Council meeting
 summary for 3 April 2012]
References: <CAGfcS_nPz=6kGg49kwZ-6GGAeB0fixzUQxyyXbU8-bbO0ndKng@mail.gmail.com> <jn04lk$q2i$1@dough.gmane.org> <20120423012540.GA2130@waltdnes.org> <jo0q2n$ebp$1@dough.gmane.org> <20120505010529.GD22763@kroah.com> <jo9t9m$aql$1@dough.gmane.org> <20120509183203.GA27545@kroah.com> <CAN3AtvrbJ0d6itGchoAMW4VfEVBvGWH=W8heULjJrLzCeF-g2Q@mail.gmail.com> <4bdd949a377d40eb85590870be440551@HUBCAS1.cs.stonybrook.edu> <50A8943E.7070607@gentoo.org> <20121118080845.GA8628@kroah.com> <50A89A73.3050709@flameeyes.eu>
In-Reply-To: <50A89A73.3050709@flameeyes.eu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Archives-Salt: 93b4912a-caa8-4c0e-83c2-77d977ac9cc7
X-Archives-Hash: af79ef3951ca3d95e8c1fff5ce93b73b

On 18/11/12 10:21, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
> On 18/11/2012 00:08, Greg KH wrote:
>> But if this fork is now the "official Gentoo fork", owned by the Gentoo
>> Foundation, and it's the way forward that Gentoo the distro is going to
>> take with regards to how the boot process works on the system, then I
>> have something to say about it, as it affects me, a Gentoo developer.
>
> Please note that I would be the first one, from a QA point of view, to
> raise a huge question mark if somebody is planning to make this the
> default anytime soon.
>
> You want to keep it around as an option? Sure, feel free.
>
> Moving as default? Over my dead public key.
>

Amen.