From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9630138010 for ; Thu, 1 Nov 2012 06:16:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CAB0D21C0A8; Thu, 1 Nov 2012 06:15:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pa0-f53.google.com (mail-pa0-f53.google.com [209.85.220.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5076D21C007 for ; Thu, 1 Nov 2012 06:15:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pa0-f53.google.com with SMTP id bj3so1456861pad.40 for ; Wed, 31 Oct 2012 23:15:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=1sYwPVsoKzhzax7mNjnHukAxII5La+N79DkJHsaT11E=; b=m+vibZlFfKvY8rExLJb+weHZCHOuzt5ARONR4nnf59tdwtjNw57Lw4NCVYHnHj7ifI h1Bs6O0XXkUPeUPl/QarIXmW5PiA0VQIbC1N3yMy4KfvVm747iV5gtBoA+a+40j+uS2G /h6sUhwk/adkXLnops+D31yVlI3CRirj1bTkYG6IM7BUYudAtlq5d9I7m/d3v1Dfbovh MeX/4sbtc1eLS+HaD+O0PEU/+yB+SU5y+K9Gt7vC4LobI3ztUmEUgZNdm+uCq4RyXX7w Kejolv8gThnAA46YMTrLti8YTkA3CofDWkWQYNqrlTDDWPDdvjgg493V6rbGxEDougpM CfBw== Received: by 10.66.87.34 with SMTP id u2mr107560627paz.82.1351750504349; Wed, 31 Oct 2012 23:15:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from saladin.home.flameeyes.eu ([2001:470:d:ce2:226:b9ff:fed7:bf1f]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ni8sm3510180pbc.70.2012.10.31.23.15.03 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 31 Oct 2012 23:15:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <50921362.9000302@flameeyes.eu> Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 23:14:58 -0700 From: =?UTF-8?B?RGllZ28gRWxpbyBQZXR0ZW7Dsg==?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121027 Thunderbird/16.0.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Maintainer needed: dev-libs/icu References: <508DA027.6090607@gentoo.org> <201210282235.05134.Arfrever.FTA@gmail.com> <20121029132834.GA4735@localhost.corp.google.com> <508EC44B.7010104@flameeyes.eu> <508ECC64.6060101@flameeyes.eu> <1351539554.21104.4.camel@rook> <20121031204353.6f013bb9@gentoo.org> <87sj8tc0l7.fsf@einstein.gmurray.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <87sj8tc0l7.fsf@einstein.gmurray.org.uk> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5a1pre Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlV3yKuP5RI3ky3bwnamJEX/iakKdrPmex6SYkcnqH1eMVHpZMaPYsoZrbT60gHUboQegnU X-Archives-Salt: 1ce7f0f3-f08a-4a87-8cdb-6a1f87e5457a X-Archives-Hash: 55bdb6923798459e1ed602a2fd9f0888 On 31/10/2012 23:13, Graham Murray wrote: > Though is it not normally a reasonable assumption that the library > consumers will be built with the same or later compiler version as the > library? In which case it does no harm. Not really, it's not. -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flameeyes@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/