From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1B36138010 for ; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 20:16:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DA51A21C0E4; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 20:15:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79D2221C0AB for ; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 20:13:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.169.32.2] (212-226-75-61-nat.elisa-mobile.fi [212.226.75.61]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: ssuominen) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7D01733D957 for ; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 20:13:12 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <509033BD.9030808@gentoo.org> Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 22:08:29 +0200 From: Samuli Suominen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120916 Thunderbird/15.0.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: udev.eclass References: <20121030190839.A9A3D21600@flycatcher.gentoo.org> <20121030165621.5441b0d6@gentoo.org> <5090333D.8060306@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <5090333D.8060306@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 1f02ff15-9ae8-46b9-95c6-11c195802e4b X-Archives-Hash: 2cbc67d359f8e43d8cf5785ce9b0f975 On 30/10/12 22:06, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 > > On 30/10/12 03:56 PM, Alexis Ballier wrote: >> On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 19:08:39 +0000 (UTC) "Samuli Suominen >> (ssuominen)" wrote: >> >> [...] >>> >>> case ${EAPI:-0} in 0|1|2|3|4) ;; *) die "${ECLASS}.eclass API in >>> EAPI ${EAPI} not yet established." esac >> >> sounds like a useless and annoying check for just exporting one >> function >> > > Also we have EAPI=5 now, so that check needs to be expanded. already done :)