From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09C7A138010 for ; Tue, 2 Oct 2012 17:51:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 90B9FE0230; Tue, 2 Oct 2012 17:51:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A10D321C002 for ; Tue, 2 Oct 2012 17:51:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.145] (CPE002401f30b73-CM001cea3ddad8.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [99.240.69.152]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: axs) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0552833C206 for ; Tue, 2 Oct 2012 17:51:02 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <506B2985.2040108@gentoo.org> Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2012 13:51:01 -0400 From: Ian Stakenvicius User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.7) Gecko/20120925 Thunderbird/10.0.7 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-pms] GLEP: gentoo sync based unified deps proposal References: <20120916135211.GC23030@localhost> <20120916153949.05ab795a@googlemail.com> <20120916160528.GD23030@localhost> <20120916175921.4f01661a@googlemail.com> <20120925224614.GF26094@localhost> <20120929170509.63efef70@googlemail.com> <20120930201453.GC2180@localhost> <20120930213018.22fe16f3@googlemail.com> <20120930214214.GE2180@localhost> <20120930225340.126b1027@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: <20120930225340.126b1027@googlemail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: e681b1c7-826d-408f-8ee1-92bf09db391c X-Archives-Hash: 881ea2e9e0ce8b608865e3217e104471 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 30/09/12 05:53 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Sun, 30 Sep 2012 14:42:14 -0700 Brian Harring > wrote: >>> The second is that it starts the conceptual shift from "cat/pkg >>> is a build dep, and cat/pkg is a run dep" to "cat/pkg is a dep >>> that is required for build and run". >> >> Fairly weak argument at best; you're claiming that via labels, >> "contextually they know it's these deps" in comparison to via >> dep:build "contextually they know it's exposed only in build". >> >> Same difference. > > It's rather a big deal now that we have := dependencies. > So you would using your labels syntax, specify an atom with a := dep using certain labels and the same atom without ':=' on other labels? I don't quite follow what you're getting at here as to how this is a big deal.. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iF4EAREIAAYFAlBrKYUACgkQ2ugaI38ACPAMJAD9FzCH4ifbkanbC17w2KGjMHP7 G4qBrJ9v2dd7sHV338EA/iK/J+NZosc+M7wefJ8J6fU4mVczlM4WiOkCNVsTSO6w =Io2B -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----