From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1D9F138010 for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 16:04:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 427FF21C046; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 16:03:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 380FE21C006 for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 16:03:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.145] (CPE002401f30b73-CM001cea3ddad8.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [99.240.69.152]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: axs) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8C6B033D743 for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 16:03:00 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <506478B2.10505@gentoo.org> Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 12:02:58 -0400 From: Ian Stakenvicius User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.7) Gecko/20120925 Thunderbird/10.0.7 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Let's populate IUSE_IMPLICIT in the base profile References: <505171DD.5040806@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 4629d4e8-6825-4d03-a1b8-3f0b270f5b09 X-Archives-Hash: 8a04ff8d0ad51efe6daa771e0f7d7789 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 27/09/12 11:57 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 1:40 AM, Zac Medico > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> The council has approved [1] "Profile IUSE injection" [2] for >> inclusion in EAPI 5, and in latest Portage we have experimental >> EAPI 5_pre2 [3] which implements all of the approved features. >> So, now would be a good time to start populating IUSE_IMPLICIT >> with whatever values may be appropriate. >> >> What values belong there? Some of the flags that appear in >> profiles/base/use.mask might make good candidates, such as prefix >> and selinux. How about other special flags like bootstrap, build, >> and test? >> > > prefix and test make sense to me. I'm not so familiar with the > others. > build is specifically for catalyst and/or for building the stages, right? If so, this one makes sense to me to add. bootstrap I would guess is similar? Unsure how that one is used at present. If IUSE_IMPLICIT would still allow the boostrapping tool to set the use flag, i see no issues having it in the list. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iF4EAREIAAYFAlBkeLIACgkQ2ugaI38ACPAh/QEAvfgmEDRGykF+3OvSRJVD684J z60BrRXTWBYwi0ngmkABAIrolomS0leqwqpt7iX9RhYvctwId1CClZZ7P88+Ms6L =R1e4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----