From: "Diego Elio Pettenò" <flameeyes@flameeyes.eu>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] autotools-multilib: wrapper eclass for multilib builds.
Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2012 09:07:21 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <505F33B9.8050003@flameeyes.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAEdQ38H9C_93wznov8xSP2jsMpVAgC3a-Rn4-hKPBLDQ1ivKMQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 22/09/2012 20:42, Matt Turner wrote:
> I think this means "make 32-bit binary packages' dependencies on amd64
> not use the emul- packages"? If so, that'd certainly be a component of
> getting rid of emul-linux-x86-xlibs. It's not in the scope of my
> project to get rid of /all/ of the emul- packages, but I agree that
> that is a worthwhile goal.
Mostly I don't want to have to build Xaw in both variants given I use
neither.. but that would happen if you just made the emul depend on the
packages that are converted...
--
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
flameeyes@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-23 16:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-22 21:24 [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] autotools-multilib: wrapper eclass for multilib builds Michał Górny
2012-09-22 21:44 ` Luca Barbato
2012-09-22 22:02 ` Michał Górny
2012-09-23 0:46 ` Alexis Ballier
2012-09-23 7:21 ` Michał Górny
2012-09-23 15:47 ` Alexis Ballier
2012-09-23 16:31 ` Michał Górny
2012-09-24 15:17 ` Alexis Ballier
2012-09-24 17:32 ` Michał Górny
2012-09-24 17:53 ` Alexis Ballier
2012-09-24 18:12 ` Michał Górny
2012-09-24 19:16 ` Alexis Ballier
2012-09-24 20:47 ` Michał Górny
2012-09-24 21:19 ` Alexis Ballier
2012-09-24 21:51 ` Michał Górny
2012-09-24 21:59 ` Alexis Ballier
2012-09-24 22:10 ` Michał Górny
2012-09-24 22:22 ` Alexis Ballier
2012-09-25 0:44 ` Matt Turner
2012-09-25 11:37 ` Alexis Ballier
2012-09-23 1:54 ` Matt Turner
2012-09-23 1:59 ` Diego Elio Pettenò
2012-09-23 3:42 ` Matt Turner
2012-09-23 16:07 ` Diego Elio Pettenò [this message]
2012-09-23 16:57 ` Matt Turner
2012-09-23 9:07 ` Thomas Sachau
2012-09-23 9:56 ` Michał Górny
2012-09-23 10:02 ` hasufell
2012-09-23 10:40 ` Michał Górny
2012-09-23 12:05 ` hasufell
2012-09-23 12:30 ` Michał Górny
2012-09-23 17:01 ` Matt Turner
2012-09-23 19:16 ` Zac Medico
2012-09-23 10:33 ` Pacho Ramos
2012-09-23 10:40 ` Michał Górny
2012-09-23 11:03 ` Pacho Ramos
2012-09-23 11:13 ` Michał Górny
2012-09-23 11:30 ` Pacho Ramos
2012-09-23 11:57 ` Michał Górny
2012-09-23 14:26 ` Peter Stuge
2012-09-23 16:32 ` Michał Górny
2012-09-24 3:18 ` Ben de Groot
2012-09-23 11:52 ` Thomas Sachau
2012-09-23 12:18 ` Pacho Ramos
2012-09-23 14:49 ` Thomas Sachau
2012-09-25 13:21 ` Alexis Ballier
2013-01-02 23:25 ` Pacho Ramos
2013-01-03 10:44 ` Thomas Sachau
2013-01-14 18:04 ` Alexis Ballier
2013-01-14 18:45 ` Michał Górny
2013-01-03 0:14 ` Peter Stuge
2012-09-23 17:07 ` Matt Turner
2012-09-23 12:30 ` Pacho Ramos
2012-09-23 17:10 ` Matt Turner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=505F33B9.8050003@flameeyes.eu \
--to=flameeyes@flameeyes.eu \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox