From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93429138010 for ; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 11:05:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 295A5E0730; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 11:04:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F33AE072C for ; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 11:03:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.169.20.228] (212-226-72-27-nat.elisa-mobile.fi [212.226.72.27]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: ssuominen) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2EC6633D73B for ; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 11:03:23 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <50585474.5090308@gentoo.org> Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 14:01:08 +0300 From: Samuli Suominen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120916 Thunderbird/15.0.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] The lack of maintainer causing media-video/mediatomb to be lastrited next References: <5058509C.4070204@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 2944bac6-cf85-4de6-87dd-8011176ffb32 X-Archives-Hash: b0ec1a5a325602fed73f16620b1a4541 On 18/09/12 13:55, Michael Mol wrote: > On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 6:44 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote: >> Use bugzilla's search for 'mediatomb' and you will find multiple counts of >> build failures the media-video@ herd is simply not capable of handling due >> to lack of resources (manpower) >> >> So if nobody steps up, I've CCd treecleaners at bug 423991, the package >> shall be removed > > I'll take that one on via proxy dev. What's the ETA for its removal? > It hasn't been masked yet, so no date of removal has been set yet, but if it is masked, then it'll be the default 30 days... Please do, you'll have to address those build failure bugs with patches and then it won't be masked - Samuli