From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72DD0138010 for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 17:55:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DD9EA21C002; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 17:55:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD91521C088 for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 17:52:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.42.39] (staff-wireless.saddleback.edu [209.129.85.50]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: zmedico) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0AF7633CEF6; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 17:52:13 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <504A344A.9070101@gentoo.org> Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 10:52:10 -0700 From: Zac Medico User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120901 Thunderbird/15.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org, Fabian Groffen Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [gentoo-portage-dev] About forcing rebuilds of other packages issue References: <1338845178.23212.1.camel@belkin4> <20120906090144.GS74867@gentoo.org> <5048A461.6080903@gentoo.org> <20120907171308.GP5282@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <20120907171308.GP5282@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 854d2451-925a-4d20-8357-0a475d28fe3f X-Archives-Hash: 09f68cd99b85d6b3e395805638e8b71c -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 09/07/2012 10:13 AM, Fabian Groffen wrote: > Could you give an example where implicit ${PV} as sub-slot would > not do what you need? Can you point out a package for which SONAME/ABI/whatever changes every time ${PV} changes? Probably not. Is the relationship between ${PV} and SONAME/ABI/whatever changes the same for every package? Absolutely not. So, we have to be able to bump the sub-slot when it's appropriate for the particular package, and every package is different. - -- Thanks, Zac -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlBKNEoACgkQ/ejvha5XGaOvAQCfZS/TAtDijXFox9cHi3BkjKgP raYAoJL77bi09/dABH3brj+2LjWYbydK =sIAY -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----