From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5108C138010 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 22:35:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A28A0E0478; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 22:35:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5570E02CB for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 22:33:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.13] (pool-71-245-176-92.pitbpa.fios.verizon.net [71.245.176.92]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: zerochaos) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8241D33D903 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 22:33:56 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <503FEAD2.7000406@gentoo.org> Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 18:36:02 -0400 From: "Rick \"Zero_Chaos\" Farina" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120815 Thunderbird/14.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] adns & ares USE flags References: <20120827231154.1678b2f6@pomiocik.lan> <20120831001858.4fb38fd7@pomiocik.lan> In-Reply-To: <20120831001858.4fb38fd7@pomiocik.lan> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5a1pre Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Archives-Salt: f415ab43-9add-4f16-bf4f-3ef6d931d4ef X-Archives-Hash: a8d9ecb7efe0f8cbd99c72df8417586a -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 08/30/2012 06:18 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > On Mon, 27 Aug 2012 23:11:54 +0200 > Michał Górny wrote: > >> Both of the flags (except for gift AFAICS) refer to asynchronous DNS >> resolution. Could we join them into one flag? I think we should retain >> 'adns', move appropriate 'ares' flags to it and modify the description >> to make it less library-centric. > > We've reached agreement with Rick and I have committed the new USE=adns > description. I will open bugs to migrate the few affected packages > soon. > > After a bit of discussion, we think it may be also useful to enable > USE=adns by default in some profile to let it benefit users. > To easy sanity existing ebuilds with USE=ares should change that to USE=adns. For things which are currently actually using adns, I believe migrating USE=adns to USE=libadns to allow users to specifically pick the (afaik deprecated) library. Thanks, ZC -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJQP+rSAAoJEKXdFCfdEflKip8QAKaHAWEDTq2vaaZto8Nz+7z7 1149IiAYzqkSotw4k7fgaXL97LpOws0PpdgCSOf27Y28IrECo5cUUgZFcObhP9K8 +WnFhxIlduWSXdgH+HulUiTOmNrupf2IcD607ZWbnzUIIr3oeZn0qlkt+aqaLXSJ MM4pf+JU39yo3Iau/35w/ooz2AQDDYOpEpwmBdwt6KHlQVCACCoKxPks3fUaliq+ Zf1vd69bA4zdvqij2KCq4WFADEYNiwJ7MC5bNTX3PURASKLIgVVodjpWz7QUMNA+ WOJ92o8qHDragXiWqq2doKmmPx3B3JzFklIp2HPtA18nsrCtNB2y6anvIs9Vpg2t C072NaFxEy4PUQ7Zx9TmJP8huGy2FlAKxckqcjD28wCZ7G4yXDh9TaHZ/d4uLcqB h1KghP31oN7vfsDPDdHtTGqr5x4hP2tRDqnLZq9tfka78NWdtY7r1Kgx3uxbBeTS eyOm7il8rDlDAV0bNwOyTN1/rU5Zy4bSg1KdiE1d4tK3oTKCXdQspEoGrDcKyTIu WjugQ4euO6qIKj+aGSo9ft6fCm+BIqSgKQf48VpHtfp+QKOOq9KW2yj8bjwIuo+m IjHCF8DsfdJb3C9PHNgPMFMXhCbSHgVJMJR5nAbEkOR6EjaxNGcS0xJmKkQs0PCS KcMP+yKml5IKVDNjF4HE =RdUV -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----