From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D77EB1381F4 for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 17:11:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9F0A3E0866; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 17:11:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6517E082D for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 17:08:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.176.28.175] (212-226-43-106-nat.elisa-mobile.fi [212.226.43.106]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: ssuominen) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D9DD51B402F for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 17:08:03 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <502A85EA.8070401@gentoo.org> Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 20:07:54 +0300 From: Samuli Suominen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120806 Thunderbird/14.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] FYI: multilib-strict no longer in FEATURES of targets/developer/make.defaults (pending on bug 424423) References: <5029318A.3050706@gentoo.org> <502943F0.3050401@flameeyes.eu> <1344882542.23246.3.camel@rook> <50297074.1030502@flameeyes.eu> <502A20F9.9060909@gentoo.org> <502A541B.7020407@flameeyes.eu> <502A8373.4050704@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <502A8373.4050704@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Archives-Salt: a522ffce-ce16-4d38-bcdb-2be8d5a5349b X-Archives-Hash: f51018074b66b643a6cb7ecaf3054c2e On 14.08.2012 19:57, Samuli Suominen wrote: > On 14.08.2012 16:35, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: >> On 14/08/2012 02:57, Samuli Suominen wrote: >>> I highly dislike libexec and have been moving stuff over /usr/lib/$pkg/ >>> on "daily basis" >> >> So instead of discussing this you just decide you don't like the path >> and go with your preference? >> >> Honestly I would have preferred for this to go through council as _it >> already went through it once_.... >> > > Sorry I was vague in that statement, I meant moving to both /usr/lib/ > when suitable (and usually the default from upstream lately) and > /usr/lib64/xfce* (Location of .so Xfce plugins) and possible couple of others than /usr/lib64/xfce*... meh, should really proof read my own msgs