From: Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] FYI: multilib-strict no longer in FEATURES of targets/developer/make.defaults (pending on bug 424423)
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 19:57:23 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <502A8373.4050704@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <502A541B.7020407@flameeyes.eu>
On 14.08.2012 16:35, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
> On 14/08/2012 02:57, Samuli Suominen wrote:
>> I highly dislike libexec and have been moving stuff over /usr/lib/$pkg/
>> on "daily basis"
>
> So instead of discussing this you just decide you don't like the path
> and go with your preference?
>
> Honestly I would have preferred for this to go through council as _it
> already went through it once_....
>
Sorry I was vague in that statement, I meant moving to both /usr/lib/
when suitable (and usually the default from upstream lately) and
/usr/lib64/xfce* (Location of .so Xfce plugins)
Xfce had compability code for finding plugins from /usr/libexec only for
4.10 series, and is marked as -DXFCE_DEPRECATED code, 4.12 will solely
use /usr/lib64/xfce4/
I've done nothing against the status quo, only following sane reasoning
and defaults from upstreams who have made a strong case for it being so,
or when they have actually made it impossible without carrying custom
patches forever
So all good, I hope this cleared misunderstandings
- Samuli
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-14 16:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-13 16:55 [gentoo-dev] FYI: multilib-strict no longer in FEATURES of targets/developer/make.defaults (pending on bug 424423) Samuli Suominen
2012-08-13 18:14 ` Diego Elio Pettenò
2012-08-13 18:29 ` Alexandre Rostovtsev
2012-08-13 21:24 ` Diego Elio Pettenò
2012-08-14 9:57 ` Samuli Suominen
2012-08-14 13:35 ` Diego Elio Pettenò
2012-08-14 16:57 ` Samuli Suominen [this message]
2012-08-14 17:07 ` Samuli Suominen
2012-08-14 17:13 ` Diego Elio Pettenò
2012-08-14 14:05 ` Michał Górny
2012-08-14 17:05 ` Samuli Suominen
2012-08-14 17:05 ` Samuli Suominen
2012-08-13 21:56 ` Mike Gilbert
2012-08-14 0:24 ` Olivier Crête
2012-08-14 10:01 ` Samuli Suominen
2012-08-13 18:25 ` Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina
2012-08-14 17:03 ` Samuli Suominen
2012-08-14 17:37 ` Alexis Ballier
2012-08-18 3:43 ` Mike Frysinger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=502A8373.4050704@gentoo.org \
--to=ssuominen@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox