From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5097C13800E for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 20:14:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 33E01E055B; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 20:13:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pb0-f53.google.com (mail-pb0-f53.google.com [209.85.160.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3C56E05DB for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 20:13:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pbbro2 with SMTP id ro2so3633792pbb.40 for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 13:13:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=Uw8jpoYdoKuVjpYCLNyFQSpmcJpjPkmsjRcZpUyy6GY=; b=bGDzDEmDKybrZjkVLdNeh7NcR5CiqND97jURvoO48SGxoAENo0EtrRYTQ+E3t6xYMx NmNk96Tj9zicwplqo8/TeVzMo8I8D7ae8LXdkvRlYq/vUzkYytldA6tXzDgsosrU5Xyq X/ZN95WJRr4GgCsvN2P+c4stdbMIzNS1f6W8/HGFdM/6eTdaniJek2QcJLhj86nlTxdD 4RgSD81DUoiSnBQqytSjPNb0t/D2acQLUmreR8TwVvP0VArvO4dNfc3oK86rknLSirnv vtO4sKf8BttqL0cbZvvu51e5r4B4t/PFg7skfzi99kg0ZUa1mrzE4tKUxNSAFaJW7Zak UVXg== Received: by 10.68.116.48 with SMTP id jt16mr15127411pbb.101.1344629584016; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 13:13:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from saladin.home.flameeyes.eu (64-60-118-178.static-ip.telepacific.net. [64.60.118.178]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id pp2sm3957220pbb.1.2012.08.10.13.13.02 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 10 Aug 2012 13:13:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <50256B3D.3040101@flameeyes.eu> Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 13:12:45 -0700 From: =?UTF-8?B?RGllZ28gRWxpbyBQZXR0ZW7Dsg==?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120720 Thunderbird/14.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] SRC_URI in metadata.xml References: <5024EC6C.3070300@anche.no> <1344600203.17434.3.camel@kanae> <20120810162127.493a455a@marga.jer-c2.orkz.net> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5a1pre Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQk8EPVRoX7c7xm2nr5r/U7CvcabagYbJqBLfQB0sZcSE5oeGEJb6AyVakN0uDFeUfhl6OL8 X-Archives-Salt: 74442b54-356b-48c0-9079-e27e92618e29 X-Archives-Hash: 350a1c4f28bcd3bed3400faafe9d31f5 On 10/08/2012 13:05, Corentin Chary wrote: > Right, our proposal is not here to replace SRC_URI, it's here to fix > the cases where SRC_URI can't be sanely used to guess new upstream > versions (strange mangling rules, unbrowsable directories, etc...). Yes I guess Jeroen was just saying why we shouldn't abandon it as Gilles proposed. FWIW for the rest it feels right to me. Although this starts to add up to the reasons why at least metadata.xml should be validated by schema, and not DTD. -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flameeyes@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/