From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDC8013800E for ; Thu, 9 Aug 2012 09:21:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4094CE0815; Thu, 9 Aug 2012 09:21:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC380E0803 for ; Thu, 9 Aug 2012 09:20:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.101] (dynamic-adsl-84-221-248-58.clienti.tiscali.it [84.221.248.58]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: lu_zero) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BA0A61B4026 for ; Thu, 9 Aug 2012 09:20:51 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <502380F4.5000603@gentoo.org> Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2012 11:20:52 +0200 From: Luca Barbato User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120801 Thunderbird/14.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Global Systemd USE Flag References: <20120808161551.425c8e62@pomiocik.lan> <20120808163359.305604e9@pomiocik.lan> <50227C5A.20006@gentoo.org> <20120808165330.5a0c8689@pomiocik.lan> <50237966.30901@gentoo.org> <20120809105733.7fa0dfa3@pomiocik.lan> In-Reply-To: <20120809105733.7fa0dfa3@pomiocik.lan> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5a1pre Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Archives-Salt: 84df0d0b-8f4b-4e09-a6a4-0db89348183d X-Archives-Hash: 6381d5a176cc8db744e5bebc513393b0 On 08/09/2012 10:57 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > No. I meant to have 'GNU' tools with 'GNU' stripped. Isn't that what > the whole discussion is about? Changing names of tools just for > someone's liking? No, we are discussing about an upstream merging two unrelated projects assuring users that nothing would change for them. In a week they claimed that it was unsupported, then backpedaled, then they changed its paths. Forking udev hadn't been considered mostly just on that premise. lu