From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CC5213800E for ; Fri, 3 Aug 2012 23:24:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 59AD2E064F; Fri, 3 Aug 2012 23:24:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4064E05F2 for ; Fri, 3 Aug 2012 23:23:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.4.5] (blfd-4d086aa6.pool.mediaWays.net [77.8.106.166]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: hasufell) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 10A8A1B4007 for ; Fri, 3 Aug 2012 23:23:33 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <501C5C61.6020001@gentoo.org> Date: Sat, 04 Aug 2012 01:18:57 +0200 From: hasufell User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.6esrpre) Gecko/20120801 Thunderbird/10.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] force verbose build log as per PMS policy? References: <50190F67.9060900@gentoo.org> <20120801180721.29f1bd53@pomiocik.lan> In-Reply-To: <20120801180721.29f1bd53@pomiocik.lan> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Archives-Salt: 21d573de-4dc2-4f44-8e63-56bedef5b63b X-Archives-Hash: a93095adcd34f168b8ae1fea24675137 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 08/01/2012 06:07 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > On Wed, 01 Aug 2012 13:13:43 +0200 hasufell > wrote: > >> We already had a discussion about cmake-utils.eclass and forcing >> verbose build log for that which was approved: >> http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_ce7d33748936663e84a5463fbf7f4d39.xml >> >> >> Also we have bug https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=384193 and >> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=379497 >> >> I opened a tracker >> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=429308 >> >> Some devs seem unsure about that or want to have a council vote >> on that https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=429332 > > PMS doesn't have such a thing as a 'policy'. Gentoo can have one, > and I believe that should be discussed per Gentoo policy. > So that would simply mean we add that information to the devmanual? Should I open a bug with a devmanual patch then? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQHFxhAAoJEFpvPKfnPDWzNbQIAK2YN5HiLwFuQ8Q1AuIGGBsK 1zEQlO3pb5wSXlfnP7oPMtBjvMaphV+bulwuUWJURE3LRatgSrNOOFsk31T0I5NJ ShsZgzxA5L/ol74STDu1Oshu7dhCdnj9Xz2/6cUIAUuMirPRz+ac74NyclIrNj9T CygYW+F0AFbPVrJAi7/IjuvtUKrpcnlCPSprycnJ0rS9D2ZSuMJ6nI3DLeTjGhra YVWDuklODbUX8ay/lmPveINGpE/bMy0dbygrXr2j+gjl6Q2w7JgYF+muCZlPD8i3 9/wK51nzKGeK855G+5Su8FMmRJwb18RpAs1ztyeOagTStB6+8pi17RsDzg6zPW4= =sOc/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----