From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10F9413800E for ; Wed, 25 Jul 2012 17:05:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D30B8E0691; Wed, 25 Jul 2012 17:04:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BB34E05ED for ; Wed, 25 Jul 2012 17:04:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.107.2] (76.sub-75-226-14.myvzw.com [75.226.14.76]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: zerochaos) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 70F981B4707 for ; Wed, 25 Jul 2012 17:04:21 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <50102749.80706@gentoo.org> Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2012 13:05:13 -0400 From: "Rick \"Zero_Chaos\" Farina" User-Agent: mi[®0m¤£lJ|_|EHSX/9.6.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Don't require assignment of empty variables in ebuilds? References: <20486.63521.223740.628410@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <201207251200.39910.vapier@gentoo.org> <20496.8429.216032.904090@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <1343235384.22460.0.camel@belkin4> In-Reply-To: <1343235384.22460.0.camel@belkin4> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5 X-Mailer: =?UTF-8?B?Q0p8dnxYL21pW8KuMG3CpMKjbEp8X3xFSFNY?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Archives-Salt: c651c127-30a5-4f63-ac8e-7091295c02f9 X-Archives-Hash: 08ce9d639c71d1ae5c6c5466b94477f1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 07/25/2012 12:56 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > El mié, 25-07-2012 a las 18:38 +0200, Ulrich Mueller escribió: > [...] >> The single exception to this is IUSE, which >> is required to be present in an ebuild even if it's empty. Maybe we >> should drop this requirement, too. > > +1 So many pointless lines of code removed... +1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJQECdJAAoJEKXdFCfdEflKHbgP/30clLKhZOPB1A+2R64nYlQk Nvt+YBHtN0kFcvKQMwFc9t7jGwhBiLPHfNBW4bfZnXuXA1PIl57/cx6EgmihYNVF xwKkwCd43ri4IfBU8HDSM7hS0ZrOzy2hRoyEAE9G15ab7L71ZWb9wJoM41Zrweoa IGHVBGFhv4MrFehRReC4Tt1MObFydlz4vofszh1/mpSPxSOx2124Mrmoe5WaWr2X +KSEVtG7H8XM3U/eFiZNGDAtRc5lF1Qt4bxSop8FmTe3pCZTCdnUip+SydZ2nLc5 LVzc0YfFdbnasQ+ujO/sG8KVY/ScJzmJMSOrsUD+8oxDiLpAu3q9Dl3yqSYe44nz P9njp6tubIuJ4DkbEn4wthcHW6OIatsxRM4rVSEOzQiWgTGGpOzyugRNkzYMJwdd FcUGeHnwZ6QnfhDi1/MsT8XzykmuGuj2I6+Vr2V3NdXWk2qLUnqadElfxIKnqZA/ mIBTCbBue5R72gRHlPqoQHwbwIAatzU15d1Xo20YogOCeAAYNko7AVqF5Dc22yGZ 8MZzCZbPu03htfa5WABVT1tN5O8HoEeilAJAxTM/W6quYullo2yseuGInY0zU9BP xf4uft+EHKCKBQF7+xYEpXdQicwtSMQSrnJgfX5r/QKWZpQDmEiyiYO9h2oO+Zxa NRG/tAktlDVrVUvJ/kN1 =bmvc -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----