From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SrHUH-0005Ut-BT for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 17 Jul 2012 23:47:29 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0327BE07E8; Tue, 17 Jul 2012 23:47:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yw0-f53.google.com (mail-yw0-f53.google.com [209.85.213.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3625E07A8 for ; Tue, 17 Jul 2012 23:46:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yhp26 with SMTP id 26so1111633yhp.40 for ; Tue, 17 Jul 2012 16:46:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=TciyyIVccbbbcjkDp61wrPSnT/aLpp37zr7899xgOB8=; b=aZh3/5s18F9ejdWIjW2K9IM+1hyGNj4zOTiBWIZylyqHz3nj5grVjnqJGigXfQIYgD lYFEEKWL+tm4/VFE7YXG6IVtuUkwIvMGT2WhlualShIRELHWFQtrT2VKD78mkDRz1skB CMm05hXtJQxyPyLmqhu+D4caqEFBGMIqaQSFmX19ZeBYLFGQh2Bv5Jiv9lUPfsuQQC/F kFXjH2op4ZoivGVT3t1OmPTgF/Ai3fgBWnjYL7PmL1FY0bpI+bYmSK6+L5yHdEIvyqvx 1qH3gY2z/UUJN2ASlowHzpRjQf2XwfD7P1/U40gtBUkvQQ6lsXUlMb5iq+DxmNW0Dchj bmYg== Received: by 10.236.73.4 with SMTP id u4mr3562835yhd.78.1342568777349; Tue, 17 Jul 2012 16:46:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.5] (adsl-98-95-149-202.jan.bellsouth.net. [98.95.149.202]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i65sm37196503yhb.3.2012.07.17.16.46.15 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 17 Jul 2012 16:46:16 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5005F946.3050501@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 18:46:14 -0500 From: Dale User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120628 Firefox/13.0.1 SeaMonkey/2.10.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Opinion against /usr merge References: <5005D70D.3060108@gentoo.org> <20120717230245.GA17825@linux1> <5005F182.50301@gmail.com> <20120717232302.GC17825@linux1> In-Reply-To: <20120717232302.GC17825@linux1> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 885927be-c68c-49bb-a7fb-8c87ef47edd8 X-Archives-Hash: e62af5ad31a1b14f55222bdd65c8e33c William Hubbs wrote: > On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 06:13:06PM -0500, Dale wrote: >> William Hubbs wrote: >>> >>> This is not quite correct. The initramfs is required because of [1]. >>> >>> >>> William >>> >> Where is [1]? > [1] http://freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/separate-usr-is-broken > > We have a way around this in some limited circumstances with > busybox[sep-usr], but that definitely does not support anything fancy > like rade, lvm, etc. > > William > Ah, read that link a while back. Nothing new there I don't guess. Dale :-) :-) -- I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words!