From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.205])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j44FaZWI028497
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 4 May 2005 15:36:36 GMT
Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 68so227959wri
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 04 May 2005 08:36:43 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
s=beta; d=gmail.com;
h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
b=uaS9ckSrMicSiTAga0zkGOKs4tSzvbZuaetko9VuDBBfKn+biFOfbFI6y6c3xaxrjKht0eL+akZSS/9UxpWBboP8DGcyKpru2NBREhKwxRw157oZKGZjhOWkLcFVhAn66+D49SaMy/bd+M54r+wMKVRjYEiKVquuny5yT7REIfk=
Received: by 10.54.15.76 with SMTP id 76mr319671wro;
Wed, 04 May 2005 08:36:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.54.31.39 with HTTP; Wed, 4 May 2005 08:36:43 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4e9f971a05050408366149c8cf@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 4 May 2005 11:36:43 -0400
From: Brett Curtis <splatbox@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: Antwort: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo could become certified for IBM Server Hardware
In-Reply-To: <4278DE86.6010307@cesmail.net>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <OF0017ACFB.3740086A-ONC1256FF7.0039E127-42256FF7.0039C5A3@inside.allianz.de>
<4278CEE3.5070206@gentoo.org> <4278D32D.3070000@cesmail.net>
<4e9f971a050504071819bca7e7@mail.gmail.com>
<4278DE86.6010307@cesmail.net>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by robin.gentoo.org id j44FaZWI028497
X-Archives-Salt: ae89c627-3d21-43e4-985f-775c4683d674
X-Archives-Hash: 763ed6faa0d5f098a3b07536795368b9
In a sense why i ask, gentoo preloaded would not intrest me.
I would like to see things like IBM supports / recommends gentoo-sources-2.6.x.
or tested with these CFLAGS with this processor.
Or emerge ibm-pixy-dust that would magically 'heal' my server...
I have only been at my job / working with gentoo for just under a year
and have never felt the need to contact support. An option to do so if
needed would be nice.
Time will tell. Till then I wait.
On 5/4/05, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky <znmeb@cesmail.net> wrote:
> Gentoo pre-loaded? Isn't that a contradiction in terms?
>
> <ducking>
>
> Seriously though, I too work with xSeries, as well as IBM desktops, and
> I've loaded Debian, Gentoo and half a dozen other distros on them
> without incident, as well as pre-Fedora Red Hat and RHEL clones. Left to
> my own devices (pun intended) I run Gentoo.
>
> Brett Curtis wrote:
>
> >This sounds great, I run six different types of xseries at work all
> >with gentoo. Never had any issues besides lm_sensors threatening to
> >cook my mobos ;)
> >
> >What exactly would this do for me as a ibm-gentoo user? Is this more
> >or less I can, if this goes through, buy a ibm with gentoo pre-loaded?
> >
> >Thanks
> >
> >
> --
> gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
>
>
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list