From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C25DC138334 for ; Tue, 8 Oct 2019 11:57:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F147BE0905; Tue, 8 Oct 2019 11:57:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A07FFE08BD for ; Tue, 8 Oct 2019 11:57:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:2001:44b8:4197:2800:a37a:5ec1:db17:1e49] (2001-44b8-4197-2800-a37a-5ec1-db17-1e49.static.ipv6.internode.on.net [IPv6:2001:44b8:4197:2800:a37a:5ec1:db17:1e49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: kensington) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3C55C34B7ED for ; Tue, 8 Oct 2019 11:57:33 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: stable-bot is down. Temporary? Forever? Can we have a contacts page for it? References: <20190926082842.16d58bdd@gentoo.org> <44e7f975-7844-45c6-4d33-15c688b7a5e0@gentoo.org> <4170258.EnrzZEfU2y@porto> To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Michael Palimaka Message-ID: <4e4819ce-84e5-8730-da43-177e1219b45e@gentoo.org> Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2019 22:57:29 +1100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.1.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4170258.EnrzZEfU2y@porto> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 2f750155-da07-4a41-9f0f-d3afe0095d51 X-Archives-Hash: 0bf3e2c2988c25df1a88a6fb7dca40f3 On 10/8/19 7:21 AM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: > In any case, since many people *do* rely on it, maybe we should declare it > official? [+] > > And, if that's OK with both of you, move it onto infra hardware? > > Happy to sponsor both for the next council meeting agenda. > > > [+] At some point the one remaining whiner doesnt count anymore. > In the past, infra has been understandably hesitant to take on new services due to staffing issues. Additionally, I understand that the current infra design does not easily allow granular access control, preventing non-infra members from easily performing maintenance on individual services. Has this situation changed? I doubt infra want to take responsibility for the bot, and I don't fancy the hassle of trying to find people to poke things on my behalf.