From: "Jesús Guerrero" <i92guboj@terra.es>
To: <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] DistroWatch and Gentoo packages: status quo and future
Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 11:11:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4b0462b4d4cc0f26a7b45e6787d51890@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AAAD714.1010107@hartwork.org>
On Sat, 12 Sep 2009 01:02:44 +0200, Sebastian Pipping
<webmaster@hartwork.org> wrote:
> Hello there!
>
>
> Among other information the Gentoo page at DistroWatch [1] displays a
> table on about 200 selected packages [2] and how up to date Gentoo is
> per package. I assume that DistroWatch is still one of the first places
> people go to get a feeling for a Distro they heard about, besides
> Wikpedia and ${distro}.org.
Seriously, I doubt that the average Gentoo user comes from Distrowatch.
Gentoo is born from a necessity which is very different from the usual
binary distro. Gentoo has never been about fame or marketing.
> The freshness of these 200 packages have influence on how people
> perceive Gentoo on DistroWatch. While the tree as a whole is what we
> should keep as up to date as possible keeping these 200 packages (list
> further down) up to date can therefore be of particular importance.
>
> From a quick look at the table these packages seem to need extra care in
> Gentoo:
>
> cups (1.4.0) 1.3.11 <-- latest in Gentoo unstable/testing
> koffice (2.0.2) 1.6.3
> mysql (5.1.38) 5.0.84
> perl (5.10.1) 5.8.8
> php (5.3.0) 5.2.10
> samba (3.4.1) 3.3.7
>
>
> Packages not found in Gentoo that DistroWatch monitors across discros
are:
>
> apt
> synaptic
> .. Debian stuff, that Gentoo does not have packaged
>
> apache
> mod_ssl
> .. Apache 1.x seems gone from Gentoo (I suppose security)
>
> openjdk
> .. Not packaged in Gentoo, no idea why
>
> checkinstall
> Miro
> .. Not in official tree (yet?), available through an Overlay
>
> xmms
> .. Removed for security reasons, available through an Overlay
>
> Maybe we should move Miro to the main tree?
Most Gentoo users will have no problem to use overlays as they need
them. If we had more developers we could as maintain more packages,
as simple as that.
Besides that, if you want some new version, you are free to use
bugs.gentoo.org to submit a bug, version bump, or whatever.
--
Jesús Guerrero
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-13 9:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-11 23:02 [gentoo-dev] DistroWatch and Gentoo packages: status quo and future Sebastian Pipping
2009-09-12 2:24 ` [gentoo-dev] " Ryan Hill
2009-09-12 12:15 ` Sebastian Pipping
2009-09-14 2:46 ` Ryan Hill
2009-09-29 1:08 ` Donnie Berkholz
2009-09-12 4:48 ` [gentoo-dev] " Aaron Bauman
2009-09-12 17:26 ` Sebastian Pipping
2009-09-12 11:23 ` Marijn Schouten (hkBst)
2009-09-12 17:29 ` Sebastian Pipping
2009-09-13 9:11 ` Jesús Guerrero [this message]
2009-09-13 10:47 ` Richard Freeman
2009-09-13 10:57 ` Jesús Guerrero
2009-09-13 13:24 ` Richard Freeman
2009-09-13 19:39 ` Sebastian Pipping
2009-09-13 19:38 ` Sebastian Pipping
2009-09-13 11:30 ` [gentoo-dev] overlay usage and maintainence [was: DistroWatch and Gentoo packages: status quo and future] Thomas Sachau
2009-09-13 18:57 ` Patrick Lauer
2009-09-13 19:03 ` Jesús Guerrero
2009-09-13 19:41 ` Patrick Lauer
2009-09-13 20:04 ` Jesús Guerrero
2009-09-13 19:25 ` Alexander Færøy
2009-09-13 19:45 ` Sebastian Pipping
2009-09-13 20:00 ` Alexander Færøy
2009-09-13 20:02 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2009-09-13 20:17 ` Sebastian Pipping
2009-09-14 14:05 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2009-09-14 18:28 ` Sebastian Pipping
2009-09-14 18:51 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2009-09-14 22:03 ` Zac Medico
2009-09-16 20:31 ` Sebastian Pipping
2009-09-16 21:21 ` Zac Medico
2009-09-13 13:59 ` [gentoo-dev] Re: DistroWatch and Gentoo packages: status quo and future Duncan
2009-09-13 14:36 ` Dale
2009-09-13 15:05 ` Albert Hopkins
2009-09-13 15:45 ` Dale
2009-09-13 19:52 ` Sebastian Pipping
2009-09-13 21:25 ` Dale
2009-09-13 21:54 ` Alex Legler
2009-09-13 22:08 ` Dale
2009-09-13 22:53 ` Alex Legler
2009-09-13 23:06 ` Dale
2009-09-13 20:00 ` Sebastian Pipping
2009-09-20 19:12 ` Duncan
2009-09-21 2:10 ` Angelo Arrifano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4b0462b4d4cc0f26a7b45e6787d51890@localhost \
--to=i92guboj@terra.es \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox