From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1Sp4pM-0007hV-8K for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 11 Jul 2012 21:52:08 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 33CC4E0796; Wed, 11 Jul 2012 21:51:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9A6AE074E for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2012 21:51:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.107.2] (73.sub-75-201-30.myvzw.com [75.201.30.73]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: zerochaos) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DC604643ED for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2012 21:51:07 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4FFDF56F.2050104@gentoo.org> Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 17:51:43 -0400 From: "Rick \"Zero_Chaos\" Farina" User-Agent: 11(Γ,|~|7$cA|"&/6.4.2 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: udev-rules.eclass References: <20120711191142.GA26844@linux1> In-Reply-To: <20120711191142.GA26844@linux1> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5 X-Mailer: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?x0N0=5Fv3R=3F=7C2_11=28=3F=2C=7C=7E=7C7=24cA=7C?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=22=26?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 2781de28-72f5-437f-8fd4-39a0c4b9b84c X-Archives-Hash: 5ca13bc57f9cf4ded2f0fbf4f053ad74 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 07/11/2012 03:11 PM, William Hubbs wrote: > All, > I am about to release udev-186-r1, which will move everything currently > in /lib/udev to /usr/lib/udev. > > For packages that install udev rules in ${FILESDIR}, we need an eclass > that tests the version of udev installed on the user's system and > installs the udev rules in the proper place. I'm not sure how many > packages do this, so if it is a very small number of packages, it may > not be worth the eclass. It would be good to discuss that as well as > reviewing the proposed eclass. I have at least half a dozen ebuilds which install rules (if you include gentoo-x86 and pentoo overlay) I'm guessing an eclass would be a good idea. Thanks, Zero -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJP/fVvAAoJEKXdFCfdEflKQcQP/igsYucmoFmJuozob2vFyKhw iTs/T3zFqyJXZh4k4WygQUhbrPToNkIvs24Ic7Zb90lYDlva1W24Vj4r+GBMOEEF 19q3wk3SDnZZI6ulLlpx6jTh4uzJeTl8jO3efOpHcnbXKjf3pJJGldotkYmbz1pD ALrZywqYCpDAf2ioQFKafBnpY7coe/qyzgtOScGy680V+YIFSX0mmHl0MAFJ/jyH V4gQvzsag227FILTRdmqMm/megYFY9POplRTVPeu/1vn6oGabPk6d+OmwR+uGoYL 8EpdG1W4RMsXGYBUsbFZWPO+q/MfJaZXa5DmwHc7z/MgNIYCj3cYmX750sWBW1EJ GclSnu0/ykJ4I3ABMXyK3d9ZEPbjXrrEY09YVTkxd3Un1zA3LEjRSP3VBu74xvUN oMf7MPxYuMK8ynR705j4r/WCZINKQhBRwNxUXnVrqsD0HS0qJRhZ4iYI3WzrJv7g rGO+K8IgZLzXaWQXSocbtAlJcl1juf47O1qu2PhtNbopC+G+s1s/A3wZwjNY3LHl Zj3nwzsijumsKid4TvHzlGtL28yPy5fQU+hniCapFr0M9QChBhLEH4VxTGqX4MzP YEVwBEqq/QZD9T8b0Hdw7PW8KTJCX7ttemW5x27WRHHSoYP2qwoOoycixuUNpJ0j XLt/mIBoiAiRJUHkynN4 =1aWY -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----