From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1Sohel-0001g2-Ef for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 21:07:39 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0FA8F21C23B for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 21:07:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F330CE08C2 for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 19:23:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.178.22] (p548D21EA.dip.t-dialin.net [84.141.33.234]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: tommy) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E5D9E1B400A for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 19:23:48 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4FFC813B.7090501@gentoo.org> Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 21:23:39 +0200 From: Thomas Sachau User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120629 Firefox/13.0.1 SeaMonkey/2.10.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: virtual/libudev References: <20120710171800.493a7c4c@pomiocik.lan> In-Reply-To: <20120710171800.493a7c4c@pomiocik.lan> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.2 OpenPGP: id=211CA2D4 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigFFCA46F814E0064305173D06" X-Archives-Salt: 59b421de-1d36-47c0-b7b8-da2c7adcc133 X-Archives-Hash: 77038fd1d5f7b20ebca8a9450fc3c6ac This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigFFCA46F814E0064305173D06 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny schrieb: > Hello, all. >=20 > Since nowadays udev is bundled within systemd, we start having two > libudev providers: >=3Dsys-apps/systemd-185 and sys-fs/udev. Making > the long story short, I would like to introduce a virtual for libudev > which would pull in either of those two. >=20 > There are three USE flags used in conditionals when depending on udev: > - gudev - for glib wrapper on udev, > - hwdb - to pull in hwids, > - static-libs. >=20 > The former two were previously provided by 'extras' USE flag, > and the third was unconditional. >=20 > I'm attaching an example virtual/libudev which does the job. Sadly, > because of the 'extras' compatibility it's a big ugly conditional. >=20 > An alternative would be to provide separate virtual/libudev > and virtual/libgudev; and maybe changing ebuilds not to depend on > [hwids] but rather pull in sys-apps/hwids directly (since that's what > the flag does). >=20 > What are you thoughts? >=20 As discussed on IRC, there is still no consensus for installing the udev files with systemd, which is the beginning for the block and the virtual. So we should first sort that point out, before we even start to think about an ebuild for an udev virtual. So for now: A clear no, i am against adding a virtual/libudev ebuild. --=20 Thomas Sachau Gentoo Linux Developer --------------enigFFCA46F814E0064305173D06 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iJwEAQECAAYFAk/8gUAACgkQG7kqcTWJkGdhgAQAkeoDTMbQYrAlzTfIgyRhDP2F 4ZnydV8UUd/cARhGbDwpONUpD+VLpDaWJjSSIItGcAJpxJd6+3imKyaQKavuphTB Kwts2YL47+GmCplPDleVk3WFXDWj71kjqP6TcRREy0y+coezt7ZRoeepxvq+D6l+ SDO+byaQVloEeD+J76g= =dQ3I -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigFFCA46F814E0064305173D06--