From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SjDZy-0005pg-IO for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 18:00:02 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 03A68E08C6; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 17:59:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2227BE08AF for ; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 17:58:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.26.5] (ip98-164-193-252.oc.oc.cox.net [98.164.193.252]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: zmedico) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9B9C81B4428 for ; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 17:58:56 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4FE8A6DF.1060604@gentoo.org> Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 10:58:55 -0700 From: Zac Medico User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120607 Thunderbird/13.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] About forcing rebuilds of other packages issue References: <4FCF2012.3040500@gentoo.org> <20120606191505.4e011158@googlemail.com> <1339007452.2706.57.camel@belkin4> <20120606193348.67b83427@googlemail.com> <1339010165.2706.62.camel@belkin4> <20120606202340.6c95711f@googlemail.com> <4FCFF945.1070804@gentoo.org> <20120607082409.GB3352@localhost.google.com> <4FD0DA34.8080409@gentoo.org> <20120607184008.09aca0fe@googlemail.com> <4FD0ECED.10201@gentoo.org> <1339092995.3014.23.camel@belkin4> <1339094634.3014.24.camel@belkin4> <20120607194448.1577119e@googlemail.com> <1339095641.3014.26.camel@belkin4> <4FD0FC81.9070701@gentoo.org> <1339097086.3014.28.camel@belkin4> <4FD101EC.7080306@gentoo.org> <1339144721.4179.1.camel@belkin4> <4FD24F73.8000601@gentoo.org> <1339183412.4179.30.camel@belkin4> <4FD2532B.4030506@gentoo.org> <20120609131542.14ac5081@googlemail.com> <4FD3B859.9050903@gentoo.org> <20120610132555.74bded8c@googlemail.com> <4FD4E4FA.2090902@gento o.org> <4FE6625A.1040309@gentoo.org> <4FE86187.6050503@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <4FE86187.6050503@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5pre Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 623d5eee-0bd0-43dc-8a8a-7cfa77088333 X-Archives-Hash: 25cd945607a9833de834b3200e5581c8 On 06/25/2012 06:03 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > On 23/06/12 08:42 PM, Zac Medico wrote: >> On 06/10/2012 11:18 AM, Zac Medico wrote: >>> On 06/10/2012 05:25 AM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: >>>> On Sat, 09 Jun 2012 13:55:53 -0700 Zac Medico >>>> wrote: >>>>> A dependency atom will have optional SLOT and ABI_SLOT parts. >>>>> Using the dbus-glib depedency on glib:2 as an example [1], >>>>> the dbus-glib dependency will be expressed with an atom such >>>>> as dev-libs/glib:2:=3D and the package manager will translate >>>>> that atom to dev-libs/glib:2:=3D2.32 at build time. So, ':' is >>>>> always used to distinguish SLOT deps, and ':=3D' is always used >>>>> to distinguish ABI_SLOT deps. Is that syntax good? >>>> >>>> Here's a nicer syntax: no ABI_SLOT variable, and SLOT=3D"2/2.32". >>>> Then you can do explicit :2/2.32 dependencies if you like, or >>>> :2 (which would match SLOT=3D"2" or SLOT=3D"2/anything"), or :2=3D >>>> (which gets rewritten to :2/2.32=3D) or :2*. If an ebuild does >>>> SLOT=3D"2", it's treated as 2/2. >>> >>> Yes, I prefer your syntax. >=20 >> In portage-2.1.11.1 and 2.2.0_alpha112 I=92ve added support for EAPI=20 >> =934-slot-abi=94: >=20 >=20 >> http://blogs.gentoo.org/zmedico/2012/06/23/automatic-rebuilds-with-exp= erimental-eapi-4-slot-abi/ >=20 >=20 > Does >=20 > anyone have a fork of the tree that's being converted to test > this new functionality? If so I'd like to sign up. That would be nice to have, but I haven't heard of anyone doing it yet. --=20 Thanks, Zac