From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SgJEW-0003w7-Lw for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 17 Jun 2012 17:25:53 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2698FE0795; Sun, 17 Jun 2012 17:25:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yw0-f53.google.com (mail-yw0-f53.google.com [209.85.213.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35311E062D for ; Sun, 17 Jun 2012 17:24:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yhp26 with SMTP id 26so3944637yhp.40 for ; Sun, 17 Jun 2012 10:24:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=tHNVCwiKEzn+BX2HYNECHHS40QBpIz5UjIY5VKQjSjM=; b=UZ6NdPS5Wuhb6+cV29C2A6gSd4CmKwWK/bnGVDs1zzckmXmdHxLAJEVWp98m/VAJKd 2nVPuIZY1N+IO18oPLNZHX3tlGca7RMRKJ97Y/fpAQ3sWIbEV0JlRJHdof5XWaiyDbNw mNwqqHHMGSJ7CqOX20OXrmK+Wy6s2r3QKnaxPOtuDkoNvSXbDJcCR4QJtmMdKBES876S S43z75MqMKPEyusB9JcfbvzkrS/X+M0gCG+1B78VwpUB5F0+NWPhUPAvxoXiMlgzh5i0 +sIP41+ikw0Y1phZc9KXNsGhi2TecvQEjyLdLN8irnbD+UTGnSwAcPpG7sWvsRssQDdT 7l8A== Received: by 10.101.180.36 with SMTP id h36mr4648772anp.39.1339953899686; Sun, 17 Jun 2012 10:24:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.5] (adsl-74-240-55-206.jan.bellsouth.net. [74.240.55.206]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id r8sm25951343ani.9.2012.06.17.10.24.58 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 17 Jun 2012 10:24:59 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4FDE12E8.7050806@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2012 12:24:56 -0500 From: Dale User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120607 Firefox/13.0 SeaMonkey/2.10 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: UEFI secure boot and Gentoo References: <20120615042810.GA9480@kroah.com> <4FDAEA24.3010303@binarywings.net> <20120615122800.GB22231@waltdnes.org> <4FDB30D7.6010702@binarywings.net> <1339889861.29373.1.camel@rinzler.hackershack.net> <20120617165800.GB31617@kroah.com> In-Reply-To: <20120617165800.GB31617@kroah.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 27bf4d7f-acf6-43d2-a744-aeda3489929e X-Archives-Hash: 8c1512f6cbcf8c3a174d11d541e48991 Greg KH wrote: > On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 06:37:41PM -0500, Steev Klimaszewski wrote: >> Just picking a random response to reply to. I'm not speaking >> officially, however, I'm pretty sure we at Genesi aren't going to pay >> Microsoft in order to boot our own boards. > If you don't want your boards to be Windows 8 certified, then you are > fine. Otherwise, you have to follow their guidelines, which I don't > think requires paying them any money if you want to run Windows 8. > > Also, as these are "your own boards", you control the BIOS, so you don't > even have to implement UEFI, or, if you do, you can control what keys > are installed in the BIOS by default. > > So I don't understand the issue here, please explain. > > greg k-h > > . > I'm glad you said that. If I was going to have to pay M$ to run Linux, I was thinking of shooting them with laser eyes or something. I have no plans to ever support M$ in any shape, form or fashion. Period. Thing is, they will likely try to make it so you can't disable it eventually. Some politician will try to make it a law if nothing else. After all, politicians are clueless anyway. Reminds me of chickens and it raining. :/ Dale :-) :-) -- I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words! Miss the compile output? Hint: EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS="--quiet-build=n"