From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1ScLOI-0001WZ-FP for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 06 Jun 2012 18:55:34 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 72106E0833; Wed, 6 Jun 2012 18:55:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA976E059B for ; Wed, 6 Jun 2012 18:54:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.176.69.164] (212-226-40-117-nat.elisa-mobile.fi [212.226.40.117]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: ssuominen) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 904581B401E for ; Wed, 6 Jun 2012 18:54:06 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4FCFA659.1030808@gentoo.org> Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2012 21:50:01 +0300 From: Samuli Suominen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120604 Thunderbird/12.0.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Lastrite: net-libs/xulrunner References: <4FCF58FE.4030809@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: e590c987-8603-4dd5-8999-74d5d6cfdf5e X-Archives-Hash: 4f622d58cecb83da32c70aa7d856f8eb On 06/06/2012 08:28 PM, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 04:19:58PM +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote: >> # Samuli Suominen (06 Jun 2012) >> # Vulnerable and no longer used by anything in tree wrt #403415 >> # Removal in 30 days >> > What do we do about other apps that are XULRunner based, and NOT yet > updated by upstream to the new xulrunner (it actually depends on remote > XUL loading that got removed in newer versions too). > (In my case, http://open-ils.org/) > we don't do anything, but you can keep on using it by copying the ebuild to your local overlay (don't forget distfiles) then when they do upgrade to new xulrunner, it's possible to package it from firefox tarball mozilla upstream doesn't support this, but some other distribs are packaging it[1] [1] http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/xulrunner/ but nothing in portage is requiring this, so -1 for packaging it from me, as they should really upgrade to something else, like webkit-gtk...