From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SbhnL-0005EJ-1E for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 05 Jun 2012 00:38:47 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 16A0DE0B87; Tue, 5 Jun 2012 00:38:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39299E0764 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2012 00:37:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.26.5] (ip98-164-193-252.oc.oc.cox.net [98.164.193.252]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: zmedico) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A472B1B4022 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2012 00:37:23 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4FCD54C2.5030508@gentoo.org> Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2012 17:37:22 -0700 From: Zac Medico User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120506 Thunderbird/12.0.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] About forcing rebuilds of other packages issue References: <1338845357.23212.3.camel@belkin4> In-Reply-To: <1338845357.23212.3.camel@belkin4> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5pre Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 775cbc9f-ffbe-47e1-bb6a-eb2de2a39474 X-Archives-Hash: 482f7e953c352eb63b44d16609dcf941 On 06/04/2012 02:29 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > - Looks like there is no consensus about what to do and, then, this > could probably be implemented on eapi... 7? While former could probably > be implemented much sooner (probably even in eapi5) Ciaran has been advocating "SLOT operator" dependencies for this, but those are not designed to work with unslotted packages, which leads to the issues discussed in bug 414955: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=414955#c10 -- Thanks, Zac