From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SakZQ-000247-8u for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 02 Jun 2012 09:24:28 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 89E83E0525; Sat, 2 Jun 2012 09:24:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ee0-f53.google.com (mail-ee0-f53.google.com [74.125.83.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F33BE06FE for ; Sat, 2 Jun 2012 09:23:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eekc41 with SMTP id c41so1189447eek.40 for ; Sat, 02 Jun 2012 02:23:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type; bh=uMiHGNHeOPJilRorKzgUL+Kp/WmTZAeABND+na6gzvw=; b=xozf2bd1ES8HA2H+L5PeE7zfMoPOWuL8wBwYKAcpltqqWzhOzXAqi5QA/rq5xpeOuH jRVXst69tLmbU5JNqr10kBVcl7uURIRZ/kgtptrI7/IDTn+/mdJRutnAkPavryWv+mLg 36NuFUli/2ZM5nm2FgTsM5bMGl+QwqpQX0aUgf2BH/bMNkdWQm/JIv3GxmV75zAKpNvm u/Ch7Qldr/OW+XLua4OD8rQ1Vu8VuOZSeBKjiknQh3KX9hR+0uM0GrrbW5EZZiDdMzKh iU0C2Cvff1WQ3YeftTgUsWEyQsZBqammpdkZf+0VpwNOHm7SthunC+6SG4QkGLBREsuJ Dd3g== Received: by 10.14.37.205 with SMTP id y53mr465115eea.124.1338628994183; Sat, 02 Jun 2012 02:23:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.5] (reverse-241.fdn.fr. [80.67.176.241]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id s47sm15502198eef.4.2012.06.02.02.23.12 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 02 Jun 2012 02:23:12 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4FC9DB75.4020105@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 02 Jun 2012 11:23:01 +0200 From: Cyprien Nicolas User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120529 Firefox/12.0 SeaMonkey/2.9.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] multiprocessing.eclass: doing parallel work in bash References: <201206011841.23302.vapier@gentoo.org> <20120602041119.GA9296@localhost> <201206020057.40625.vapier@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <201206020057.40625.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5pre Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig47C7D0326F638053D0AB7842" X-Archives-Salt: 85c18de2-0765-47c5-8310-73e1d7de821f X-Archives-Hash: d0c0d37ee29a56a067405a356a0ac21e This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig47C7D0326F638053D0AB7842 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Saturday 02 June 2012 00:11:19 Brian Harring wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 06:41:22PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: >>> makeopts_jobs() { >> >> This function belongs in eutils, or somewhere similar- pretty sure >> we've got variants of this in multiple spots. I'd prefer a single >> point to change if/when we add a way to pass parallelism down into the= >> env via EAPI. We do have variants at several places in ebuild/eclass (scons-utils, waf...). And some failed at some point, see [1]. > it's already in eutils. but i'm moving it out of that and into this si= nce it=20 > makes more sense in this eclass imo, and avoids this eclass from inheri= ting=20 > eutils. Neat. Thanks for having added it. Lot of build related eclass would need it, if we want to factorize that code. We'll have to give maintainers incentive for migrating their code :-) [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D337831 --=20 Fulax Gentoo Lisp Contributor --------------enig47C7D0326F638053D0AB7842 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk/J23wACgkQWxOlHn1uWpeW5wCeLj/ubCneWo/UpqI8AWDSLFta 14IAnjGleT0iItENVQwGteKYBukrlmfb =imBK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig47C7D0326F638053D0AB7842--