From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SZmFS-0005xJ-Pl for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 30 May 2012 16:59:50 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 810A1E074E; Wed, 30 May 2012 16:59:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6AAAE0782 for ; Wed, 30 May 2012 16:59:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.127] (unknown [24.51.166.201]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: titanofold) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D7C7B1B4001 for ; Wed, 30 May 2012 16:59:02 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4FC65199.9000504@gentoo.org> Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 12:58:01 -0400 From: "Aaron W. Swenson" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120501 Thunderbird/12.0.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver References: <4FBCDB3D.1070009@gentoo.org> <20120530165332.GA21063@kaini.schwarzvogel.de> In-Reply-To: <20120530165332.GA21063@kaini.schwarzvogel.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5pre Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 82ff6990-fa09-47da-8bdb-9d675c085073 X-Archives-Hash: fed12c286f3fce5c7c3698b10879f015 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 05/30/2012 12:53 PM, Tobias Klausmann wrote: > Hi! > > On Wed, 30 May 2012, Rich Freeman wrote: >> On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 6:16 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman >> wrote: >>> Yeah... this is why I was asking about access to infra to test >>> the conversion; so far, I haven't had any replies, though. >> >> A mock conversion would probably help with creating >> procedures/docs/etc as well. It is nice to say that we're "just >> going to use git" but I think everybody has a slightly different >> picture of how that is going to work. > > I recommend having a smallish set of willing alpha/beta testers > for this. This usually helps with some of the near-edge cases. > You'll still find a thousand other bugs once things go live for > everybody. Still, it turns a million into a thousand. It also gives > you slightly more realistic load test. .... Regards, Tobias > As one that's relatively new to Git, I'm a perfect candidate for testing. If we go this way, I volunteer. - - Aaron -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iF4EAREIAAYFAk/GUZkACgkQVxOqA9G7/aDxogEAjEsS6k0M9TejvCAoYISvuk1u odo5ecLsyshwvwRlk3sA+wUeVAfGrafgH1gKpSrEedk1OT5x7HfsMquK0owq0/Np =mzDU -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----