From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SXCxt-0001Rn-Oy for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 23 May 2012 14:55:06 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B51E8E05EB; Wed, 23 May 2012 14:54:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29AE0E058A for ; Wed, 23 May 2012 14:54:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from paul.ics.kfa-juelich.de (ics6305.ics.kfa-juelich.de [134.94.119.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jlec) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 289241B4028; Wed, 23 May 2012 14:54:12 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4FBCFA11.2060209@gentoo.org> Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 16:54:09 +0200 From: justin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120502 Thunderbird/12.0.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver References: <4FBCDB3D.1070009@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <4FBCDB3D.1070009@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.1 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigB6B8787128EE5BB2003B2DA8" X-Archives-Salt: 181a6f6c-3f9b-4395-80d0-437b62390256 X-Archives-Hash: 445dce14097ebfba5ca93a83757e332b This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigB6B8787128EE5BB2003B2DA8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 23/05/12 14:42, Michael Weber wrote: > Hi, >=20 > i've looked at the blockers of "[TRACKER] portage migration to git" > [1] and want to discuss "testing git-cvsserver" [2]. >=20 > There are two proposed scenarios how to migrate the developers write > access to the portage tree. >=20 > "Clean cut" turns of cvs access on a given and announced timestamp, I want to see to it gone. +1 --------------enigB6B8787128EE5BB2003B2DA8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEAREKAAYFAk+8+hEACgkQgAnW8HDreRaX7QCgh6xnY7C5LDKmlUZPdbPjmLJo 9K0AoLcZxmybhPNcHDw6geDK2V1C7X86 =q7SA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigB6B8787128EE5BB2003B2DA8--