From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SWYnz-0000mT-GH for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 21 May 2012 20:02:11 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C6EC5E0D3A; Mon, 21 May 2012 20:01:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F5D9E0D23 for ; Mon, 21 May 2012 20:00:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.4.5] (blfd-5d822d59.pool.mediaWays.net [93.130.45.89]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: hasufell) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C0E241B400C for ; Mon, 21 May 2012 20:00:51 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4FBA9E60.2070704@gentoo.org> Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 21:58:24 +0200 From: hasufell User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.4) Gecko/20120502 Thunderbird/10.0.4 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] enhancement for doicon/newicon in eutils.eclass References: <4FB97D1D.9070004@gentoo.org> <20120521191439.181a8c2d@pomiocik.lan> In-Reply-To: <20120521191439.181a8c2d@pomiocik.lan> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 7e895c9d-7363-49a1-9010-ac28a4c46dac X-Archives-Hash: 2e84067c5b78e8f10e8a001948c95d70 On 05/21/2012 07:14 PM, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > On Mon, 21 May 2012 01:24:13 +0200 hasufell > wrote: >=20 >> I want support for installing icons into the appropriate >> directories which are under /usr/share/icons/... and not just >> pixmaps. >>=20 >> proposal attached + diff >>=20 >> This should not break existing ebuilds. Tested a bit and open >> for review now. >=20 > I'd rather see a new function for that rather than making doicon()=20 > overcomplex. >=20 The new features are totally optional, so there is nothing complex. If someone is looking for support for /usr/share/icons/... directories without setting insinto he can have it. doicon/newicon without options (should) behave exactly the same way.