From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SSYwu-0001k3-Ji for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 10 May 2012 19:22:52 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 574E1E0B19; Thu, 10 May 2012 19:22:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 027C5E094F for ; Thu, 10 May 2012 19:22:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.26.5] (ip98-164-193-252.oc.oc.cox.net [98.164.193.252]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: zmedico) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 719E068601 for ; Thu, 10 May 2012 19:22:01 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4FAC1558.6050704@gentoo.org> Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 12:22:00 -0700 From: Zac Medico User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120506 Thunderbird/12.0.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Tightly-coupled core distro [was: Council meeting summary for 3 April 2012] References: <4F85E21C.4060106@gentoo.org> <20120423012540.GA2130@waltdnes.org> <20120505010529.GD22763@kroah.com> <20120509183203.GA27545@kroah.com> <20120509223630.GA29213@kroah.com> <4FAC0F9A.7070907@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: <4FAC0F9A.7070907@googlemail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5pre Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 00e0c930-576f-4729-ba18-5e875d6904e9 X-Archives-Hash: 5ce77ebe48329739194aedbcf4d29573 On 05/10/2012 11:57 AM, David Leverton wrote: > Greg KH wrote: >> No one forces you to use any of this software if you do not want to. >> There are lots of other operating systems out there, feel free to switch >> to them if you do not like the way this one is working out, no one is >> stopping you. > > Or alternatively, the people who hate Unix could move to some other OS > that suites them better, rather than trying to destroy what everyone > else is perfectly happy with. Isn't it presumptuous to say that they hate Unix? Maybe their vision of how they'd like Unix to be is just different from yours? -- Thanks, Zac