From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SRbYn-0000UG-GL for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 08 May 2012 03:58:01 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CDFBDE0856; Tue, 8 May 2012 03:57:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D39DE083C for ; Tue, 8 May 2012 03:56:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.9] (pool-96-229-219-163.lsanca.fios.verizon.net [96.229.219.163]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: lu_zero) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 56B831B4013 for ; Tue, 8 May 2012 03:56:55 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4FA8999F.8090407@gentoo.org> Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 20:57:19 -0700 From: Luca Barbato User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120413 Thunderbird/11.0.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Chromium bundled code References: <4F9E44D0.70002@linx.net> <201205031918.48928.vapier@gentoo.org> <4FA32795.6000809@gentoo.org> <201205032122.12231.vapier@gentoo.org> <20120504213546.GA8823@waltdnes.org> <4FA44FA1.4060101@gentoo.org> <20120505005945.GB22763@kroah.com> In-Reply-To: <20120505005945.GB22763@kroah.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: e651eb31-a2d7-46e7-8ea6-337a4f7dcb70 X-Archives-Hash: 535eb257aabbca5954ab2d01686a8c72 On 04/05/12 17:59, Greg KH wrote: > On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 02:52:33PM -0700, Luca Barbato wrote: >> On 04/05/12 14:35, Walter Dnes wrote: >>> What could work is a shim or compatability layer that gets >>> called, and pre-processes requests and forwards them to mdev. >> >> That's my idea =) > > and then, look, you have reimplemented udev. > I think that's the whole point of the exercise. lu -- Luca Barbato Gentoo/linux http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero