From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SQNUe-0007YX-QS for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 04 May 2012 18:44:41 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 522E6E067D; Fri, 4 May 2012 18:44:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E97AE05FE for ; Fri, 4 May 2012 18:35:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from phjr-macbookpro.local (fi122.internetdsl.tpnet.pl [80.53.34.122]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: phajdan.jr) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B8EFF1B401C for ; Fri, 4 May 2012 18:35:15 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4FA42157.4000506@gentoo.org> Date: Fri, 04 May 2012 20:35:03 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?IlBhd2XFgiBIYWpkYW4sIEpyLiI=?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Chromium bundled code References: <4F9E44D0.70002@linx.net> <201205031918.48928.vapier@gentoo.org> <4FA32795.6000809@gentoo.org> <201205032122.12231.vapier@gentoo.org> <4FA41999.1030207@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <4FA41999.1030207@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.1 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigF7B8A815F6A071759FDE490C" X-Archives-Salt: defd516f-77a1-42b7-a724-4f703cff18c6 X-Archives-Hash: ef9c88d903344c46c4a7f9405a2a5899 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigF7B8A815F6A071759FDE490C Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 5/4/12 8:02 PM, Luca Barbato wrote: > I consider dbus still not reliable for core services. Just curious - why? I just have no idea about how dbus works or what are possible problems with it. --------------enigF7B8A815F6A071759FDE490C Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAk+kIV0ACgkQuUQtlDBCeQKJRQCeN1fTcijEOyw5GaI58GwmYTTW JWEAnRCcFTE/ecOP73Wmf3U+lGtCWLnh =7A52 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigF7B8A815F6A071759FDE490C--