From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SQMse-0000zX-DR for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 04 May 2012 18:05:24 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 433E6E074E; Fri, 4 May 2012 18:04:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D210BE06BF for ; Fri, 4 May 2012 18:03:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.253.112] (64-60-118-178.static-ip.telepacific.net [64.60.118.178]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: lu_zero) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5501E1B4003 for ; Fri, 4 May 2012 18:03:17 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4FA419F8.8080907@gentoo.org> Date: Fri, 04 May 2012 11:03:36 -0700 From: Luca Barbato User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120413 Thunderbird/11.0.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Chromium bundled code References: <4F9E44D0.70002@linx.net> <4F9E47AF.9080201@gentoo.org> <201204301211.05705.vapier@gentoo.org> <4FA2512E.7030806@gentoo.org> <20120503213930.GA5562@waltdnes.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 30dff9a2-8197-4266-b00f-c036b7ebb2a2 X-Archives-Hash: 581d40a8c4ea7d2d4a7f2471b6ef7598 On 04/05/12 01:37, Alec Warner wrote: > I would argue that the Chrome Team's idea of what a 'WEB BROWSER' is > and your idea of what a 'WEB BROWSER' is are vastly divergent. That is > totally OK and you are free to use whatever software you prefer. I > somehow doubt Chrom{e,ium} is losing tons of users due to their udev / > dbus / etc requirements. If dbus and libudev are just for fringe features might be nice disable them. I wonder if there isn't already a setting for it. chrome for android won't use them anyway. -- Luca Barbato Gentoo/linux http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero