From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SQ6ik-0006BN-Ra for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 04 May 2012 00:50:07 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1E512E07F2; Fri, 4 May 2012 00:49:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EFA2E079C for ; Fri, 4 May 2012 00:49:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.253.112] (64-60-118-178.static-ip.telepacific.net [64.60.118.178]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: lu_zero) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 96A581B4002 for ; Fri, 4 May 2012 00:49:08 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4FA32795.6000809@gentoo.org> Date: Thu, 03 May 2012 17:49:25 -0700 From: Luca Barbato User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120413 Thunderbird/11.0.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Chromium bundled code References: <4F9E44D0.70002@linx.net> <20120503213930.GA5562@waltdnes.org> <201205031918.48928.vapier@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <201205031918.48928.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 407c8433-9690-46e4-8b23-0acf329b4f85 X-Archives-Hash: c23084402fe642d90b3eb144f8654786 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 03/05/12 16:18, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Thursday 03 May 2012 17:39:30 Walter Dnes wrote: >> I think Chromium's problem is that it's based on Chrome. > > you've got that wrong. Chrome is based on Chromium. > >> And Google is "pulling an AOL" by trying to turn Chrome into an OS for its >> Chromebooks. > > ChromeOS and Chrome are run as semi-separate projects. the former uses Gentoo > to provide a slim/secure Linux base in which you run Chrome. > >> I fail to understand why a *WEB BROWSER* needs elfutils and dbus and udev as >> hard-coded dependancies. > > you need to think bigger. Chromium supports joystick inputs (which come and > go) for playing games in the browser, so udev makes sense. So is it using libudev to get that information? I guess would be possible to patch it out, probably dbus would cover that base as well. (As soon I have some time I might dabble with a dbus integration for mdev) lu - -- Luca Barbato Gentoo/linux http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk+jJ5UACgkQ6Ex4woTpDjQOtQCZAYnPNGSZ/qlukltSyLL+zACm vuYAoJp6uvjatUzQrJRK53Hl9kQD9IiN =onw7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----