From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SPsRx-0001lC-C8 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 03 May 2012 09:35:50 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7FFEBE0788; Thu, 3 May 2012 09:35:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CEF4E0768 for ; Thu, 3 May 2012 09:34:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from phjr-macbookpro.local (fi122.internetdsl.tpnet.pl [80.53.34.122]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: phajdan.jr) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 112341B401E for ; Thu, 3 May 2012 09:34:53 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4FA2512E.7030806@gentoo.org> Date: Thu, 03 May 2012 11:34:38 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?IlBhd2XFgiBIYWpkYW4sIEpyLiI=?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Chromium bundled code References: <4F9E44D0.70002@linx.net> <4F9E47AF.9080201@gentoo.org> <201204301211.05705.vapier@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.1 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig8D37BFEC8C2960F29A4913FC" X-Archives-Salt: 4804dd5a-007e-49da-b998-5c73abe3ef55 X-Archives-Hash: 4427f67360cb8c41bf3ffde0e551145e This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig8D37BFEC8C2960F29A4913FC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 4/30/12 6:32 PM, Matt Turner wrote: > On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Mike Frysinger wr= ote: >> On Monday 30 April 2012 12:00:59 Rich Freeman wrote: >>> doing it wrong. I don't like how Google develops Android in the dark= , >>> or that they bundle 1GB of third-party stuff in their Chromium source= >>> and distribute a favored binary-only derivative. >> >> err, they distribute a Chromium source tarball, and their build system= >> includes flags to use the system versions of those bundled libs if you= so >> choose. i think this is a perfectly fine compromise. Right, and the source tarball is ~175 MB. It's not perfect, but it's also far from 1 GB. The bundled libraries are included in the tarball. > It looks like chromium-20.0.1115.1.ebuild removes 45 bundled > libraries. Note that the list in the ebuild is about _excluding_ bundled libraries, i.e. the directories listed are removed and everything else is removed. I'm generally co-operating with upstream (also as part of that upstream, but with limited resources at least for now) so that there are options to use system libraries, and what's left is non-trivial to unbundle (e.g. mesa) but it should be unbundled at some point. > and still has TODOs in place to use the system's ffmpeg, > hunspell, (Open?)SSL, SQLite, and libvpx. Yes, the TODOs can definitely tell you what's left there. The list is not comprehensive though. Ah, and help is always welcome - with unbundling libraries, gcc-4.7 porting, and other things. Feel free to send your thoughts/questions to chromium@g.o. Pawe=C5=82 --------------enig8D37BFEC8C2960F29A4913FC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAk+iUTkACgkQuUQtlDBCeQJvzQCcCAreELJH0y2+OuVdNRlYJrI3 nHQAn18HTBgPZVhUyWGvrntz0vK/7SBp =q+Fm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig8D37BFEC8C2960F29A4913FC--