public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zac Medico <zmedico@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] About validate_desktop_entries in eutils.eclass
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 10:05:55 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F9EC673.4090806@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F9D7013.9090309@gentoo.org>

On 04/29/2012 09:45 AM, Petteri Räty wrote:
> On 15.04.2012 17:12, Pacho Ramos wrote:
>> El dom, 15-04-2012 a las 16:02 +0200, Michał Górny escribió:
>>> On Sun, 15 Apr 2012 11:59:50 +0200
>>> Pacho Ramos <pacho@gentoo.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I am unsure about validate_desktop_entries() utility. It's currently
>>>> provided by eutils.eclass and only called by net-firewall/fwbuilder.
>>>> Shouldn't this be moved to a "qa" check? Current way is pretty useless
>>>> as it's not used by most of packages, and calling it from a lot of
>>>> eclasses/ebuilds doesn't sound me like a good idea.
>>>>
>>>> What do you think?
>>>
>>> Agreed. It should be in repoman.
>>>
>>
>> The check needs to be run over desktop file going to be installed, not
>> sure how repoman can handle it, it looked to me more like a emerge job
>> (like is done with other qa checks run before installation)
> 
> There's actually already code in repoman that runs
> desktop-file-validate. It of course only works for installed packages.
> Someone could make it run runtime too.

The repoman code works on $FILESDIR. It looks like we also want to run
it after src_install.

Also, it looks like we might need to handle a special case for Konqueror
Service Menus:

  https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=414125
-- 
Thanks,
Zac



  reply	other threads:[~2012-04-30 17:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-04-15  9:59 [gentoo-dev] About validate_desktop_entries in eutils.eclass Pacho Ramos
2012-04-15 10:20 ` Samuli Suominen
2012-04-15 14:02 ` Michał Górny
2012-04-15 14:12   ` Pacho Ramos
2012-04-15 14:23     ` Michał Górny
2012-04-29 16:45     ` Petteri Räty
2012-04-30 17:05       ` Zac Medico [this message]
2012-04-30 17:50         ` Pacho Ramos

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F9EC673.4090806@gentoo.org \
    --to=zmedico@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox