From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SOHKg-0004w1-1n for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 28 Apr 2012 23:45:42 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 83123E0746; Sat, 28 Apr 2012 23:45:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7C1DE073C for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2012 23:44:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.12] (cpe-76-95-212-76.socal.res.rr.com [76.95.212.76]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: lu_zero) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 401CF1B404F for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2012 23:44:53 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4F9C80F9.7040809@gentoo.org> Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2012 16:44:57 -0700 From: Luca Barbato User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120413 Thunderbird/11.0.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Council meeting summary for 3 April 2012 References: <20353.41193.129711.306663@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <20120408220422.GA26440@kroah.com> <20120410184504.GB8504@linux1> In-Reply-To: <20120410184504.GB8504@linux1> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 39c1f29a-513b-4a3d-a10c-c738dc2b99e2 X-Archives-Hash: 322724075f2dbd34650a8a3c8378386b On 10/04/12 11:45, William Hubbs wrote: > Also, I am going to reiterate what Greg said. This is not an issue with > udev, but with the entire linux ecosystem. As in bluez using dbus and some mount helpers requiring libraries in /usr. > There are binaries in /{bin,sbin} which link against libraries in > /usr/lib for example. We could try to have an exact list and figure out exactly what is it and how impacting it is. If any of those are needed for early-boot it would be something to address nonetheless. > Also, with the appropriate documentation changes, which are being worked > on (see [1]), I feel that the statement above that newer udev can't be > stabled should be re-evaluated. lu -- Luca Barbato Gentoo/linux http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero