From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SMixj-0008Dg-Iz for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 16:51:35 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 21DD0E0C0F; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 16:51:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73EA3E0AFD for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 16:49:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.42.149] (staff-wireless.saddleback.edu [209.129.85.50]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: zmedico) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B086A1B401E for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 16:49:14 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4F96D982.9000200@gentoo.org> Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 09:49:06 -0700 From: Zac Medico User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120404 Thunderbird/11.0.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New third party mirrors References: <20120424130959.GB13543@falgoret> <20120424183826.499652b0@pomiocik.lan> In-Reply-To: <20120424183826.499652b0@pomiocik.lan> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 8315e0a3-7718-41db-a953-5dc72ac95d9e X-Archives-Hash: 7f993681ccc8c2d9361ebbb9431a610d On 04/24/2012 09:38 AM, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 16:19:11 +0000 > "Robin H. Johnson" wrote: > >> On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 04:50:49PM +0200, Corentin Chary wrote: >>>>> $ ./mirrors.py --all --count >>>>> 297 ?? ?? http://pear.php.net >>>>> 297 ?? ?? http://pear.php.net/get >>>>> 88 ?? ?? ??http://pecl.php.net >>>>> 88 ?? ?? ??http://pecl.php.net/get >>>> These are already mirror bouncers. If you visit the above, you'll >>>> get the closest mirror for downloading. >>> And since there is already ~10 "mirrors" with only one actual >>> backend, should they go to thirdpartymirrors or not ? If not, what >>> about this pseudo-mirrors already present in thirdpartymirrors ? >> I think we should add the pseudo-mirrors, but explicitly mark them as >> such in the file, so that they don't get duplicate entries added (eg >> adding us.pear, de.pear and the pear bouncer is bad. Should have just >> the bouncer). > > It'd be great if we could add some kind of additional mirror entries, > which would be used by repoman to signal missing mirror:// entries but > won't be used for downloads. We could just add them in thirpartymirrors under fake names that nobody=20 will use. --=20 Thanks, Zac