From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SMCPD-00085v-MZ for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 06:05:47 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1FDC7E0CD7; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 06:05:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2550E0B59 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 06:04:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.26.2] (ip98-164-193-252.oc.oc.cox.net [98.164.193.252]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: zmedico) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6B74E1B4028 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 06:04:56 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4F94F106.4030106@gentoo.org> Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2012 23:04:54 -0700 From: Zac Medico User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120404 Thunderbird/11.0.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Council meeting summary for 3 April 2012 References: <4F833687.4040004@gentoo.org> <4F8503DF.1010802@gentoo.org> <4F85E21C.4060106@gentoo.org> <20120423012540.GA2130@waltdnes.org> In-Reply-To: <20120423012540.GA2130@waltdnes.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: e080e0d2-d1f1-4a0a-b9dd-72734b7494b6 X-Archives-Hash: 40f3c1de3215ee6577c58d9515f10976 On 04/22/2012 06:25 PM, Walter Dnes wrote: > systemd and udev are being merged into one tarball. For the "foreseeable > future", it will still build 2 separate binaries. What happens down the > road if/when it all becomes one combined binary? If becomes a problem, then it will be dealt with. There's no sense in doing anything until it becomes a real problem though. Meanwhile, we can sit back and relax. :-) > Forking/patching udev would be a major undertaking. Maybe we'd be > better off making add-ons for mdev to provide missing udev functionality. Or, just use an initramfs. :-) > BTW, how would a non-programmer (at least not C programmer) like me > forward these ideas to the Gentoo Council? You'll see an email on this list a week or two before the next council meeting, and you can reply to that with your idea. -- Thanks, Zac