From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SM1JD-0001Bc-9W for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 22 Apr 2012 18:14:51 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F03A7E0A94; Sun, 22 Apr 2012 18:14:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C493FE0952 for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2012 18:13:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.26.5] (ip98-164-193-252.oc.oc.cox.net [98.164.193.252]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: zmedico) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 498851B4006 for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2012 18:13:02 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4F944A2D.30004@gentoo.org> Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2012 11:13:01 -0700 From: Zac Medico User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120404 Thunderbird/11.0.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Council meeting summary for 3 April 2012 References: <20353.41193.129711.306663@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <20120408220422.GA26440@kroah.com> <4F833687.4040004@gentoo.org> <4F8503DF.1010802@gentoo.org> <4F85E21C.4060106@gentoo.org> <20371.51767.784259.131892@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <4F94462C.9000006@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <4F94462C.9000006@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 08c638b1-30b9-4b5d-a816-691731104398 X-Archives-Hash: 518298f41f245c49f283c986bc5b8430 On 04/22/2012 10:55 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote: > On 04/22/2012 05:28 AM, Steven J Long wrote: >> Ulrich Mueller wrote: >> >>> | 3. New udev and separate /usr partition (30 minutes) >>> | >>> | See [4]: "Decide on whether a separate /usr is still a supported >>> | configuration. If it is, newer udev can not be stabled and >>> | alternatives should be investigated. If it isn't, a lot of >>> | documentation will have to be updated. (And an alternative should >>> | likely still be provided.)" >>> | >>> | [4] >>> | [> project/msg_c96d1b724cd736702820fa5ff1547557.xml> >>> >> From the first reply: >> >> "To clarify, the question is whether or not we support a separate /usr >> _without_ mounting it early via an initramfs." >> >> I hope that settles that particular issue. >> > > Hmm... I see that in Zac's reply, thanks for that. > > Unfortunately, from what I can tell, that clarification was not actually > part of the proposed agenda [5], nor was it directly referenced. So the > subject of the vote still seems open to interpretation. Yeah, it almost seems as though the council was being intentionally vague and leaving things open to interpretation. In response, we had William post about the ">= udev-182 tracker" [1], to which Tony seemed to respond positively [2]. [1] http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_015e73cfccbd72fa956a8bdbc2e9cdc0.xml [2] http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_fb17ccaadc95c7f3f27d0613c13aa04e.xml -- Thanks, Zac