From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-51054-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1SLKrB-0000CI-VB
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 20:55:06 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EDFDDE0A99;
	Fri, 20 Apr 2012 20:54:47 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp-out.neti.ee (smtp-out.neti.ee [194.126.126.39])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4FD2E09B1
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 20:53:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by vm-relay3.estpak.ee (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCB9162E;
	Fri, 20 Apr 2012 23:53:47 +0300 (EEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at vm-relay3.estpak.ee
Received: from smtp-out.neti.ee ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (vm-relay3.estpak.ee [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 3c6790AVOJAD; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 23:53:45 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from mail.neti.ee (neti-relayhost2.estpak.ee [88.196.174.199])
	by vm-relay3.estpak.ee (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2012C53;
	Fri, 20 Apr 2012 23:53:45 +0300 (EEST)
Received-SPF: None (no SPF record) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=90.190.167.138; helo=mail.dataring.ee; envelope-from=leho@kraav.com; receiver=vapier@gentoo.org 
X-SMTP-Auth-NETI-Businessmail: no
Received: from mail.dataring.ee (138.167.190.90.dyn.estpak.ee [90.190.167.138])
	by NETI-Relayhost2.estpak.ee (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 00A7C3E6;
	Fri, 20 Apr 2012 23:53:44 +0300 (EEST)
Message-ID: <4F91C1AA.9080608@kraav.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 23:06:02 +0300
From: Leho Kraav <leho@kraav.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120312 Thunderbird/11.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
CC: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] epatch: splitting out common options from user-specific
 ones
References: <iRHui-2kD-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <25544530.1346.1334950699692.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbpz13> <201204201559.39849.vapier@gentoo.org>
In-Reply-To: <201204201559.39849.vapier@gentoo.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: 54ef10b3-dfdd-49c5-961b-93ebb97b5250
X-Archives-Hash: ab3ef8acbe8c74aead58822bb8196662

On 20.04.2012 22:59, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> i just committed it since no one responded.  so sync up.
>
>> $ EPATCH_OPTS="--ignore-whitespace" emerge -va pf-sources
>
> that's not the intention.  EPATCH_OPTS modification should be inside the
> ebuild.

I can't see how having this available could hurt anything. Am I blind?