* [gentoo-dev] Is gcc-4.7.0 going to be in portage tree anytime soon?
@ 2012-04-17 13:36 kabel
2012-04-17 13:40 ` Agostino Sarubbo
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: kabel @ 2012-04-17 13:36 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
Hello there, I just wanted to ask when an ebuild for gcc-4.7.0 will be
in portage tree (unkeyworded, I suppose, like 4.6.0-4.6.2 are).
Thank you.
--
http://blackhole.sk/~kabel/
kabel <kabel@blackhole.sk>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] Is gcc-4.7.0 going to be in portage tree anytime soon?
2012-04-17 13:36 [gentoo-dev] Is gcc-4.7.0 going to be in portage tree anytime soon? kabel
@ 2012-04-17 13:40 ` Agostino Sarubbo
2012-04-17 14:54 ` Mike Frysinger
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Agostino Sarubbo @ 2012-04-17 13:40 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 386 bytes --]
On Tuesday 17 April 2012 15:36:51 kabel wrote:
> Hello there, I just wanted to ask when an ebuild for gcc-4.7.0 will be
> in portage tree (unkeyworded, I suppose, like 4.6.0-4.6.2 are).
> Thank you.
You can just follow the version bump request:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=409315
--
Agostino Sarubbo ago -at- gentoo.org
Gentoo/AMD64 Arch Security Liaison
GPG: 0x7CD2DC5D
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 490 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] Is gcc-4.7.0 going to be in portage tree anytime soon?
2012-04-17 13:40 ` Agostino Sarubbo
@ 2012-04-17 14:54 ` Mike Frysinger
2012-04-17 15:22 ` kabel
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Mike Frysinger @ 2012-04-17 14:54 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 438 bytes --]
On Tuesday 17 April 2012 09:40:22 Agostino Sarubbo wrote:
> On Tuesday 17 April 2012 15:36:51 kabel wrote:
> > Hello there, I just wanted to ask when an ebuild for gcc-4.7.0 will be
> > in portage tree (unkeyworded, I suppose, like 4.6.0-4.6.2 are).
>
> You can just follow the version bump request:
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=409315
yes, please follow the bugs rather than posting to the gentoo-dev list
-mike
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] Is gcc-4.7.0 going to be in portage tree anytime soon?
2012-04-17 14:54 ` Mike Frysinger
@ 2012-04-17 15:22 ` kabel
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: kabel @ 2012-04-17 15:22 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
Thank you.
On 17.04.2012 16:54, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Tuesday 17 April 2012 09:40:22 Agostino Sarubbo wrote:
>> On Tuesday 17 April 2012 15:36:51 kabel wrote:
>>> Hello there, I just wanted to ask when an ebuild for gcc-4.7.0 will be
>>> in portage tree (unkeyworded, I suppose, like 4.6.0-4.6.2 are).
>>
>> You can just follow the version bump request:
>> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=409315
>
> yes, please follow the bugs rather than posting to the gentoo-dev list
> -mike
--
http://blackhole.sk/~kabel/
kabel <kabel@blackhole.sk>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-04-17 15:28 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-04-17 13:36 [gentoo-dev] Is gcc-4.7.0 going to be in portage tree anytime soon? kabel
2012-04-17 13:40 ` Agostino Sarubbo
2012-04-17 14:54 ` Mike Frysinger
2012-04-17 15:22 ` kabel
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox