From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SHwA8-0004mD-P3 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 11:56:37 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 24429E09B4; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 11:56:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6A08E09B0 for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 11:55:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from phjr-macbookpro.home (acmb190.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl [83.10.129.190]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: phajdan.jr) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CA4E564272 for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 11:55:26 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4F857117.1060907@gentoo.org> Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 13:55:03 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?IlBhd2XFgiBIYWpkYW4sIEpyLiI=?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] pybugz call for testers References: <20120410175425.GA8504@linux1> <4F849BDA.8030802@gentoo.org> <20120410211745.GA9144@linux1> In-Reply-To: <20120410211745.GA9144@linux1> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigD2C5F31F56492F476808729D" X-Archives-Salt: 97fa3d06-b514-43ca-975e-1283953e69de X-Archives-Hash: 7e860eaf643b683bc680bd5cdd975ff9 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigD2C5F31F56492F476808729D Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 4/10/12 11:17 PM, William Hubbs wrote: > On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 10:45:14PM +0200, "Pawe=C5=82 Hajdan, Jr." wrot= e: >> On 4/10/12 7:54 PM, William Hubbs wrote: >>> I can name a couple of issues that are api limitations that we can't = do >>> anything about: >>> - you can't search on cc: or keywords fields. >> That's going to be a problem for arch testing needs (e.g. STABLEREQ >> keyword and x86@ cc-ed). How about doing the searches "the old way" th= at >> allowed the above. >=20 > That is not so easy to do since we have completely gotten rid of the ol= d > method of communicating with bugzilla. That method was not reliable and= > had broken several times with bugzilla upgrades, but using the web > services will be more stable. Right, scraping HTML that way was obviously brittle, but at least it worked (in the pragmatic sense). Without that functionality, the batch-stabilization tools I and other devs use would be broken. If possible, please restore the old code, possibly marked as deprecated and not officially supported (best effort, patches welcome is fine), and named maybe search_brittle or something similar. --------------enigD2C5F31F56492F476808729D Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAk+FcSMACgkQuUQtlDBCeQIs9gCfQ3nbDr7Muqt+jXJM7tfM+vrL KDIAniVLtW3PaxCk/DFTftE9m/4VtnO5 =VLbm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigD2C5F31F56492F476808729D--