From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SGUJP-00037r-65 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 07 Apr 2012 12:00:11 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6407FE0DD2; Sat, 7 Apr 2012 11:59:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC655E0DC5 for ; Sat, 7 Apr 2012 11:59:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.127] (unknown [24.51.165.157]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: titanofold) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0E3B61B403D for ; Sat, 7 Apr 2012 11:59:06 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4F802C04.5000304@gentoo.org> Date: Sat, 07 Apr 2012 07:59:00 -0400 From: "Aaron W. Swenson" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120401 Thunderbird/11.0.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Inconsistent flag name in some packages? webm and vpx speifically References: <4F7B5A47.2040302@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 9ee01792-4268-416b-91cf-dda16c3de7da X-Archives-Hash: 961eb33ac8f8ca50243b2f02ba0b9211 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 04/07/2012 07:52 AM, Pawe=C5=82 Rumian wrote: > Markos Chandras : >=20 >> Thank you for your report. Yes this looks like an issue. If I had >> to choose I'd pick 'vpx' but it seems to me that media-video@ >> and mozilla@ teams needs to reach consensus. >=20 > Should I poke them in any way? Reopen and assign the bug to them? >=20 > BR, Pawe=C5=82 Rumian >=20 Yes. Yes. I'd vote that the flag name should be 'webm' as that's more readily recognizable than 'vpx'. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iF4EAREIAAYFAk+ALAQACgkQVxOqA9G7/aBe8gEAj2LSviLEzQasFXmJzjT0oiHp cEuId91yPkkdWH3sZbUA/29RjvgHCA/gCmKIfkq1arV0z7ZbsP11bBezwUoxcW1f =3DGG+2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----