From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-50841-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1SER8C-0004w3-4B
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 01 Apr 2012 20:12:08 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 50FD3E0B04;
Sun, 1 Apr 2012 20:11:52 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-wg0-f53.google.com (mail-wg0-f53.google.com [74.125.82.53])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41A79E09C4
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 1 Apr 2012 20:11:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by wgbfm10 with SMTP id fm10so1921630wgb.10
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 01 Apr 2012 13:11:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references
:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=SWFJt3u+ge4bh1TwlVYP0aOBUAlfzgRL5YJQt+s94ME=;
b=jKe/9yf1u4kVPsWWVWqn0Xf4KqJzBoAnGu8OSyIIiIMuqKZyM/ExYGVpOoNaOYDVni
NpGokxqJ9/L9Vw/PhuMvNOCReNU2BXNVP1LqCy9vQUJ9d9x5X6WDOhTWlmIF7mpM+rrH
y2srPYjAIaA+absRSSlzyNbVJgqUnJhvKCQPNfcD0sX1BNpam+ngXJ4PfiCCbqEnlm4P
J/yx/T6O72PNHWNHc4OPssb3+Xn6ggM25OjZFi/ib0XibX1/E77MDozfsDvQ5vTNCVN/
BlS8gMmhqe5u4QgYoph0hUTnKq/5yPQjUHn18iBV3A9awnuqGgoxW8reQOQ2dhfNiYd7
PNUg==
Received: by 10.180.91.165 with SMTP id cf5mr17846872wib.2.1333311069454;
Sun, 01 Apr 2012 13:11:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.2.229] (89-76-190-198.dynamic.chello.pl. [89.76.190.198])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id gg2sm45075341wib.7.2012.04.01.13.11.07
(version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
Sun, 01 Apr 2012 13:11:08 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4F78B6CF.8000304@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2012 22:13:03 +0200
From: Maciej Grela <maciej.grela@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120331 Thunderbird/11.0.1
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Should ${T} be defined in pkg_prepare ?
References: <4F76F44A.4020409@gmail.com> <20120401195544.45f95b27@googlemail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20120401195544.45f95b27@googlemail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: dfd7ef44-1e19-47d5-b47a-b9f5a960a971
X-Archives-Hash: 722fc7f6f8d2669b08909366acc8e5b7
On 01.04.2012 20:55, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 14:10:50 +0200
> Maciej Grela <maciej.grela@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I've read the PMS and I haven't found information whether this
>> variable is supposed to be set during pkg_prepare or not. Therefore I
>> ask, what is the proper behaviour here ? Is there documentation on
>> what special env variables are supposed to be defined in each stage ?
>> Can this be considered as a bug in paludis ?
> Mmm. The spec implies that it should be set to something sane... There's
> no guarantee, of course, that the amount of space in ${T} in pkg_pretend
> is anything like the amount of space that will be available for the
> build, but check-reqs is deliberately designed to be wildly inaccurate.
>
Should I create a bug for this ?
Best regards,
--
Maciej Grela